Show newer

On Monday, NASA will announce which astronauts will circle the moon next year as the crew of Artemis II. It is thus also, in a sense, an announcement of who isn't going to land on the moon in 2025.

Weird but true: Protons and neutrons are made of quarks, but the mass of those quarks accounts for only 1% of their total mass. The other 99% is energy from relativistic motion & quantum fields.
99% of your weight is energy, not matter.
physics.aps.org/articles/v11/1 #perspective

My kink is having machines huskily breathe into my ear about how they're going to do my job

Every is dangerous, and the more powerful the tool the more dangerous it is. Of course. Is as dangerous as ? Probably not. It might be in the same league as, oh, say —and those have done a hell of a lot of damage. But they haven't done it by ushering in the . Instead the damage is from slow, creeping, cumulative change where the effect of any one individual event is too small to measure.

So I really think the focus on world-ending scenarios takes away from the conversations we need to be having. This reminds me a lot of the simmering "how far is too far" debate, especially the kibitzing from "" with no understanding of the and an sense that isn't nearly as developed as they think it is. There are conversations on that topic I'd like to have without the constant Greek chorus of "! ! !"

Since 1971, NASA has been 20 years from landing a man on Mars. Having been to SpaceX Headquarters and interviewed nearly every major player there, I would bet money they land astronauts in the decade. It is happening. nextgov.com/emerging-tech/2023

Last reporting trip for this story. I can’t tell you the details, but it’s going to be an exciting one. I can’t wait for you to read it next month.

Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.