Pinned post

Hello, all. I've been around for a few days but haven't yet made an post. So here we go.

I'm a consultant with [The Bioinformatics CRO](bioinformaticscro.com/) working on a variety of small and large projects ranging from fundamental genomics to clinical decision support. Before that, for several years I was a postdoc and ORISE fellow specializing in high-altitude medicine and physiology at the University of Colorado Altitude Research Center. My academic background is a nearly even mix of , machine learning, and biology.

The ARC* has been sadly moribund for a few years, but thanks to collaborations with other groups, we're [starting to get more active again](harcsummit.org/). Hopefully I will have more to say about that in the future. Meanwhile, feel free to ask me anything about medicine---I think I still remember most of it.

Years before _that_, I was an Air Force (after a brief stint as an Army infantryman) followed by a couple of years as a civilian EMT. My time in patient care informs my approach to science: the numbers I crunch represent human lives.

Otherwise, I'm an armchair hoping to be able to call myself an _amateur_ paleontologist again one of these days---by which I mean actually spending some time in the field and/or the prep lab---a too-occasional science fiction writer, and chronically sleep deprived. Also, my life is the internet: it's cats all the way down.

*Fellow fans may recognize the jacket in the picture. My wonderful fiancée found it for me when I was hired at the ARC, for exactly the reason you think.

Dipping my toe in the waters of prediction:

I will be very surprised if there is not a large, open ground presence in in the next six months, if not sooner. Maybe a significant presence too, but that will be quieter, a la the in .

The funny thing is, there's a way we probably *could* install a government that would be popular enough to survive with just US support rather than bleeding out in the jungle—namely, back and give her whatever she needs to consolidate power. But is too angry about a woman getting the he so clearly deserved for that ever to happen. Not to mention his crew of chest-and-Bible-thumpers who don't want to see any woman in charge of any country, ever.

So instead we'll end up keeping most of 's machinery of dictatorship in place, and supporting it against an ever-growing resistance armed with Chinese weaponry. "Advisers" in 3 ... 2 ... 1 ...

Tell the DJ to put Fortunate Son on repeat.

I just opened a feature request on that got assigned issue number 404. Hopefully someone will see it even so!

The idea that the of at war should be off-limits is a relic of the days when and noble expected to be treated respectfully by their counterparts on the other side while they all cheerfully trampled into the mud. Let it and them die.

Another addendum: like many writers, I'm a bit of a when it comes to the writing process. After decades of messing around with various word processors, these days I do my writing in using a text editor, then convert it to Word for sharing it with the rest of the world. I'm genuinely happier that way. checkers and the like can fuck right off.

But I'm uneasy with people who create rejecting the *idea* that might be useful for endeavors. I don't yet know what a good use case would be, and I doubt I'll ever want or one of its descendants to write a draft for me. Making it my work would feel like editing someone else's manuscript, even if it's good—which of course current AI writing isn't, but that could change. I just don't want people who think about the future professionally to assume that we'll never advance past the present.

Show thread

Jamming the two together: I'm alternately amused and annoyed by how much has doing things like , but relegates care to . Uh ...

Show thread

As both a and a , I'm going to go out on a limb and say the ethical bar for is *far* lower than the bar for . Reading a bad story may make you feel like you've wasted an irretrievable chunk of your life, but it's very unlikely to land you in the morgue. So the idea that there might be ethical uses for in medicine but not in writing seems rather strange to me.

"Well, *I* thought it was funny."

— my tombstone, probably

Speaking as someone whose entire adult life has been spent keeping people alive, I'm going to go out on a limb and say Lillian knows a hell of a lot more about saving lives than Elon .

Hello, .

have been telling you for months that we don’t care if is in the files. If he raped kids, he should pay the same penalty as anyone else. But I guess y’all have your talking points and you are by God going to stick with them.

You know as well as we do that is all over the redacted parts. Every time you pretend otherwise, you’re announcing to the world that you’re just fine with pedos as long as they’re on your side. For some of you, it’s a selling point.

We see you, and we won’t forget.

===

Feel free to quote, share, or copy and paste if you find it useful.

Texting is fine for short communications, to be clear. But anything more than a few sentences is actively painful.

Also, that 30-minute video you want me to watch could and should have been an essay. If there's no transcript, fuggedaboudit.

Show thread

Something you may not know about me: I dislike reading long-form content on my phone, or really doing anything on my phone more than necessary. E.g. if you want to have an in-depth conversation with me, please send me a direct message rather than texting.

Hey, it was better than spilling a bunch of jewel boxes all over the passenger seat floor and leaning down to fumble through them while going 80 mph down the interstate! Which I, uh, may have done a time or two.

Sword in one hand, latte in the other, combat boots on both feet. It's a thing.

is . That definition is about 2500 years old, and although have been trying to come up with a better definition ever since, no one has. All claimed counterexamples are .

A lot of my fellow and/or have trouble with the word "belief" because they associate it with faith—which in turn can be defined as belief *without* justification, or whose truth is unknowable. But it's really a lot simpler than that.

If I walk inside dripping wet, and someone asks me if it's raining, and I say it is because I've just been out in it, then I'm stating my belief. What you believe is anything you can honestly affirm if someone asks you, "Is such-and-such true?"

Belief can be simple and immediate or complicated and long-term. It can be trivial or profound. It can be true or false, justified or unjustified, testable or untestable. The honesty, that's the key. Knowledge, a proper subset of belief, has a much higher standard.

The above is an extended way of saying that if someone begins a loaded question with an aggressive, sarcastic "Did you know ..." then you are amply justified in truly believing they're full of shit.

I'm pleased to announce that Becca now has her own storefront. As well as the , there are now some lovely address labels, with more of her amazing to come. If there's anything you'd like to see, let me know and I'll be happy to pass the request along!

zazzle.com/store/r_e_lee_photo

Points for originality, though, I guess. I wonder how he gets along with his fellow -obsessed manboys who go gaga for -themed shit?

Show thread

"Being a male doesn't make you a !!
MEN believe in , its a prerequisite to being called a MAN.
You have a male not a man 💯🙏✝️"

Well, there it is, the stupidest thing I'll read on the internet all day. Hopefully.

Unashamed plug: Becca Lee, my beloved wife and an amazing , finally has her work up for sale. If you're looking for a 2026 , this would be an *excellent* choice. 🙂

zazzle.com/things_with_wings_a

Do you want the in ? Because this is how you get the PLA in Venezuela.

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.