@metaphorology @gwensnyder Two observations: (1) they aren't as "acute" – we don't have anything like these videos of Hamas kidnapping civilians that are covered in blood – instead it's just like oh maybe Israel isn't responding to reports of settlers harassing shepherds as fast as they should – and (2) Hamas keeps diverting attention away from Israel's sins by covering civilians with blood and then kidnapping them.
I guess one way to look at it is like what others are saying in this thread: Hamas is really doing any warmongering Israeli politicians a huge favor by keeping the narrative focused away from whatever Israel is doing wrong.
It's like Putin: maybe he had a legitimate complaint about too many countries joining NATO or whatever. Nobody cares about that anymore, to say the least. (He must have known this would happen, though, so I suspect his real reasons are elsewhere. Same with Hamas.)
@ech @gwensnyder I don't necessarily know if "acute" is the right word, because media representation is inherently biased; neither do I disagree that Hamas is acting according to how the right wing Israeli government expects them too but the reaction is also not just a reaction to the current government but generations of anger and bitterness amongst most parties.
The one point I cannot concede, is that under international law Israel never had the legal entitlement to Palestinian land.