Frédérique Bordignon @fredbordignon@qoto.org

RT @InstitutDATAIA
[SEMINAR] See you on March 14th, at @Inria_Saclay for a co-organized seminar with @soda_INRIA @InriaMind teams!
📢 Elisabeth Bik (@MicrobiomDigest) will hold a conference about "The Dark Side of Science: Misconduct in Biomedical Research".
http://bit.ly/3FbADpz
⏲ 12:00-1:30pm

RT @BordeauxTea
We were at @institutpasteur today to talk about our journey with @BordeauxTea , #openscience and Reproducibility.
A big thanks to the organizers, especially @NPRougier, for hosting Recherche Reproductible & inviting us.
Stay tuned… great things are coming!

RT @jrgptrs
@Andrew___Baker Is it realistic to expect that from reviewers? Replication is real scientific work, nothing you do en passant. Shouldn't we replicate more as part of the business-as-usual scientific work? And thereby create incentives. Sorry for self-promotion but... http://bit.ly/3LcDhyX

RT @lemire
Actual email exchange I just had.

RT @UKRIO
We have developed a Landscape Map, showing the many groups and stakeholders involved in UK research integrity.

We have also added a link to an accessible version of this map on the page.

View on website: https://ukrio.org/research-integrity-landscape-in-the-uk/

#ResearchIntegrity #ResearchEthics #Researchers

RT @ml4rrieu
RT @petersuber
Kudos to the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) for this important new feature.
https://blog.doaj.org/2023/03/07/new-filter-author-retains-all-rights/

"Earlier today, we released an upda…
https://fediscience.org/@petersuber/109982284546116915

RT @dustin_wright37
People are losing their trust in science -- #SciComm has a huge impact on this. Sensationalism, false promises, uncalibrated uncertainty all play into this. My latest blog post looks at this and asks how #NLProc can help.
https://dustinwright.substack.com/p/distortions-in-science-communication?utm_source=twitter&sd=pf

RT @rosie_open
Check out the pre-print of the NERQ-kick off:
❗️Seven challenges for #researchintegrity #education: current status and recommendations
🔗https://osf.io/5w9kg

RT @TranspariMED
.@C0PE statement: AI tools should not be listed as an author as they cannot take responsibility for submitted work
https://publicationethics.org/cope-position-statements/ai-author #chatgpt

RT @TranspariMED
.@C0PE statement: AI tools should not be listed as an author as they cannot take responsibility for submitted work
https://publicationethics.org/cope-position-statements/ai-author #chatgpt

RT @EcoledesPonts
[#Séminaire 🗓️06/03] Rencontre autour de l'ouvrage "Le futur des métropoles. Temps et infrastructure"
💬Nathalie Roseau, Prof #ecoledespontsparistech & chercheuse au #LATTS

🔗https://ecoledesponts.fr/rencontre-autour-de-louvrage-le-futur-des-metropoles-temps-et-infrastructure

#WeAreEELISA #ecoledesponts @Ecologie_Gouv @ParisTech_News @ParisEstSup

RT @GrumpyReviewer2
#AcademicChatter #AcademicTwitter https://twitter.com/djgould94/status/1632497713563713537

RT @jrgptrs
Is Economics self-correcting? We have a new discussion paper, joint with N Fiala & @flneubauer. Quick answer is: No, rather not. We reviewed all replications published as comments in the AER. Plus, we surveyed the authors. A short thread 1/. http://bit.ly/3y0wMYp #EconTwitter

RT @LexBouter
"... intentionality is difficult to prove beyond doubt and is only one of many criteria that should be taken into account when deciding on the severity of a breach of research integrity..." https://bit.ly/3SPKois
@WCRIFoundation @NRIN_Integrity @EmbassySci

RT @csugimoto
Elated to find our book on #equity for #WomeninScience at the #AAASmtg! Eager to share it with the world! @lariviev @sppgatech @GeorgiaTech @UMontreal @Harvard_Press #AAAS2023

RT @kembellec
L'intro des actes du dernier colloque @Doc_Soc est accessible librement, en attendant l'ouvrage d'ici quelques jours
"Communication scientifique et science ouverte
Opportunités, tensions et paradoxes"
ed. A. Mahé, I. Mayeur, E. Poupardin, C. Prime-Claverie
https://www.calameo.com/read/00001585692ec092c0f18

RT @yjerden
Oddly soothing footage of a soap bubble freezing.
https://www.reddit.com/r/oddlysatisfying/comments/11io5p7/soap_bubble_freezing/

RT @DanLarremore
New one on my list of favorite papers.

"Academic Urban Legends"

It explores the ironic follies of how we cite literature by tracing a myth: that we think spinach has a lot of iron only because of a decimal point error in the early 1900s. h/t @jugander

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0306312714535679

RT @BoukacemZeg
https://sciencebusiness.net/news/Universities/leaked-eu-member-states-set-out-reform-scientific-publishing

RT @aselbst
Starting with the point that lawmakers are “freaked out” about ChatGPT is an example of criti-hype (@STS_News’s term), where even critics give AI too much credit. ChatGPT is a very good predictive text generator, presenting certain concrete challenges. No need to be freaked out https://twitter.com/geomblog/status/1631662835947257856