Frédérique Bordignon @fredbordignon@qoto.org

RT @s1excitedstate
My job is safe from AI... for now
@MicrobiomDigest
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.01.28.526052v1

RT @pash22
Very good tweetorial by Florian. @lemondefr is defo living in a fantasy world @lucadf https://twitter.com/NaudetFlorian/status/1634464249136181248

RT @MishaTeplitskiy
Data are surely out of date now but still:

At PNAS, acceptance rate for
➡️direct submissions: 18%
➡️contributed* submissions: 98% ‼️

* contributed = author is NAS member, can choose his/her reviewers etc.

https://www.nature.com/articles/510330a

RT @RetractionWatch
Wiley paused Hindawi special issues amid quality problems, lost $9 million in revenue https://retractionwatch.com/2023/03/09/wiley-paused-hindawi-special-issues-amid-quality-problems-lost-9-million-in-revenue/

RT @Mario_Malicki
After some delay, our survey (n=3,659) was published today. In 2018, 21% of authors, reviewers, and editors believed we should preregister studies, and 60% that we should share data and code. Additionally, 20% admitted sacrificing quality for quantity. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0270054

RT @MicrobiomDigest
The lightest degree of punishment for scientific fraud is: no punishment at all. The fraudster goes on publishing scientific papers. They go on getting paid by their university. They go on speaking at conferences and teaching students.
@StuartJRitchie writes. https://twitter.com/StuartJRitchie/status/1628814012942106626

RT @InstitutDATAIA
[SEMINAR] See you on March 14th, at @Inria_Saclay for a co-organized seminar with @soda_INRIA @InriaMind teams!
📢 Elisabeth Bik (@MicrobiomDigest) will hold a conference about "The Dark Side of Science: Misconduct in Biomedical Research".
http://bit.ly/3FbADpz
⏲ 12:00-1:30pm

RT @BordeauxTea
We were at @institutpasteur today to talk about our journey with @BordeauxTea , #openscience and Reproducibility.
A big thanks to the organizers, especially @NPRougier, for hosting Recherche Reproductible & inviting us.
Stay tuned… great things are coming!

RT @jrgptrs
@Andrew___Baker Is it realistic to expect that from reviewers? Replication is real scientific work, nothing you do en passant. Shouldn't we replicate more as part of the business-as-usual scientific work? And thereby create incentives. Sorry for self-promotion but... http://bit.ly/3LcDhyX

RT @lemire
Actual email exchange I just had.

RT @UKRIO
We have developed a Landscape Map, showing the many groups and stakeholders involved in UK research integrity.

We have also added a link to an accessible version of this map on the page.

View on website: https://ukrio.org/research-integrity-landscape-in-the-uk/

#ResearchIntegrity #ResearchEthics #Researchers

RT @ml4rrieu
RT @petersuber
Kudos to the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) for this important new feature.
https://blog.doaj.org/2023/03/07/new-filter-author-retains-all-rights/

"Earlier today, we released an upda…
https://fediscience.org/@petersuber/109982284546116915

RT @dustin_wright37
People are losing their trust in science -- #SciComm has a huge impact on this. Sensationalism, false promises, uncalibrated uncertainty all play into this. My latest blog post looks at this and asks how #NLProc can help.
https://dustinwright.substack.com/p/distortions-in-science-communication?utm_source=twitter&sd=pf

RT @rosie_open
Check out the pre-print of the NERQ-kick off:
❗️Seven challenges for #researchintegrity #education: current status and recommendations
🔗https://osf.io/5w9kg

RT @TranspariMED
.@C0PE statement: AI tools should not be listed as an author as they cannot take responsibility for submitted work
https://publicationethics.org/cope-position-statements/ai-author #chatgpt

RT @TranspariMED
.@C0PE statement: AI tools should not be listed as an author as they cannot take responsibility for submitted work
https://publicationethics.org/cope-position-statements/ai-author #chatgpt

RT @EcoledesPonts
[#Séminaire 🗓️06/03] Rencontre autour de l'ouvrage "Le futur des métropoles. Temps et infrastructure"
💬Nathalie Roseau, Prof #ecoledespontsparistech & chercheuse au #LATTS

🔗https://ecoledesponts.fr/rencontre-autour-de-louvrage-le-futur-des-metropoles-temps-et-infrastructure

#WeAreEELISA #ecoledesponts @Ecologie_Gouv @ParisTech_News @ParisEstSup

RT @GrumpyReviewer2
#AcademicChatter #AcademicTwitter https://twitter.com/djgould94/status/1632497713563713537

RT @jrgptrs
Is Economics self-correcting? We have a new discussion paper, joint with N Fiala & @flneubauer. Quick answer is: No, rather not. We reviewed all replications published as comments in the AER. Plus, we surveyed the authors. A short thread 1/. http://bit.ly/3y0wMYp #EconTwitter

RT @LexBouter
"... intentionality is difficult to prove beyond doubt and is only one of many criteria that should be taken into account when deciding on the severity of a breach of research integrity..." https://bit.ly/3SPKois
@WCRIFoundation @NRIN_Integrity @EmbassySci