diversity (in tech)
@SecondJon That sounds to me like an oversimplication of the issue. In a way you're right, because you and I could look the same, but if I grew up poor in a different country and you grew up rich in another, we are more likely going to have more diversity of thought. Socioeconomic background, political background, all that shapes us. However, hiring teams can certainly start by at least taking it seriously that they should hire people of a different gender, sexual orientation, race, etc. Studies show we lack diversity on teams because we hire people who remind us of us. So we have to start somewhere.
diversity (in tech)
@SecondJon Right. I agree with you that diversity doesn't just mean looking different (assuming you mean race and not just different haircuts.) I don't have the energy to unpack what else you're saying.
diversity (in tech)
@hashtaggrammar
LOL. I like the diversity of haircuts model.
diversity (in tech)
@hashtaggrammar
It blows my mind that someone would exclude people who don't seem to be just like them. My own team is diverse looking, but we were going for diverse thinking, which happened in this case to create a diverse looking team.
I think if we aim for a diverse looking team is easy to seek a team with no diversity of thought. But we feel virtuous because we have the form of diversity regardless of substance.
To me its a form VS substance issue. If we go for the substance (diverse thinking) we'll often get diverse appearance /form. I don't think we get diverse thought just by hiring people that appear different.
Tech is known as being far left ideologically, and taking those who don't fall in line with same thinking out back and beating them (figuratively).
It's rich to have that same group claim to be the champion of diversity in thought.