RT @astrofalls@twitter.com

For the last 134 years people have photographed the andromeda galaxy, but everyone up until now has missed this giant undiscovered nebula!

🐦🔗: twitter.com/astrofalls/status/

@sandorkruk to be fair that's a BIG patch of sky in that image. Like several full moons across.. and you need really deep and precise imaging to pull something so LSB out... so I don't find this too surprising.

@sandorkruk (cool though to this that it was hiding there all this time!).

@karenlmasters @sandorkruk i poked very briefly at the rnaas and could not satisfy myself that this was not Galactic. Do we know this is not Galactic? It looks a lot like the magnetized structures we have been studying in the MW for about a decade.

@jegpeek @rdrimmel @karenlmasters @sandorkruk Actually I did, but it's hard to say. I don't have a proper fits file with Bray's image and there is lots of filamentary stuff in this area.

@HIprocessor @rdrimmel @karenlmasters @sandorkruk seems like astrometry.net might give you a reasonable fits header?

@jegpeek @rdrimmel @karenlmasters @sandorkruk

If you upload to astrometry.net it gets a CC license, which I cannot do, as I do not own the image.

@sandorkruk @rdrimmel @jegpeek @karenlmasters could it be super foreground? Like Local Cloud (10pc) or Local Bubble (few hundred pc) range?

@jradavenport @sandorkruk @rdrimmel @karenlmasters it sure could. I would bet mostly likely at the 100-300 pc distance range.

@jradavenport @jegpeek @sandorkruk @karenlmasters There's got be a UV source somewhere.. on the other side of Andromeda? In that direction anyway.

@jegpeek @jradavenport @sandorkruk @rdrimmel @karenlmasters

I haven’t read the paper so I’m curious, but what is the probability of a galactic structure with the same orientation as Andromeda in that direction?

@crawfordsm @jegpeek @jradavenport @sandorkruk @rdrimmel @karenlmasters There’s a good chance that this is a Galactic foreground, but the high [O III]/H alpha would make it a pretty unique object even within our own Galaxy. A comparison object is the Ursa Major Arc which was only found because it lies in the direction of M81 and M82. skyandtelescope.org/astronomy-

@crawfordsm @jegpeek @jradavenport @sandorkruk @rdrimmel @karenlmasters Two possible Galactic foregrounds are the Radcliffe Wave (150 pc) and the Perseus Arm (1600 pc). WHAM surveys of halpha, [NII] and [SII] show diffuse ionized gas below the Galactic plane along the line of sight to M31. Both stuctures have embedded low surface brightness SNR/X-ray emission associated. ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006

@crawfordsm @jegpeek @jradavenport @sandorkruk @rdrimmel @karenlmasters Obviously a spectrum would help, if you can get good velocity resolution. But a survey of a larger area in [OIII] also seems called for. I bet there’s more of these out there. We first found the Ursa Major Arc as a 2 degree filament in 2001; 20 years later, Andrea Bracco and Marta Alves showed it was 30 deg long and there were other arcs in the sky!

@bobbenjamin @crawfordsm @jegpeek @jradavenport @sandorkruk @rdrimmel @karenlmasters some great band names up there. Lockman Hole, Extended Groth Strip, astronomers are the best at nomenclature.

@crawfordsm @jradavenport @sandorkruk @rdrimmel @karenlmasters by eye they look askew by maybe 15 degrees? So 1 in 12 chance of being this well oriented or better at random?

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.