@reidrac Technology in the 21st century is a circus run by the clowns.
@BitBun I'm talking out of my ass here (as always), but I think that saying means that your belly should not get cold, because you risk spending the next day in the toilet. True story.
Un lector actual de Euclides las pasaría canutas para entender ideas que se enseñan en primaria. Eso se debe a que Euclides usaba lenguaje natural para explicar conceptos matemáticos.
Siempre me ha llamado la atención que haya tanta gente que vea el lenguaje natural como la opción más sencilla para comunicar ideas (o, en este caso, ejecutar tareas), porque lo cierto es que las notaciones científicas se inventaron por una razón. Lo mismo pasa con los lenguajes de programación.
Para crear un buffer, yo prefiero teclear C-x C-f y escribir un nombre. No me cuesta nada. Para algunos tipos de archivo, además, tengo plantillas que me rellenan campos por defecto. Si tuviera que escribir o decir lo que quiero cada vez, me moriría de asco.
Today I learned about this awesome metal band:
@LibrosdeBabel A juzgar por lo que veo en librerías, la ficción ya no se escribe para hombres —hablo en general, obviamente hay nichos tipo Chuck Palahniuk (que tampoco son para todos los hombres).
El otro día fui con mi hermana a la Casa del Libro y, aparte de que no había más que gordas con pelos de colores, me di cuenta de que la ficción, ya desde sus portadas, está hecha para mujeres. Todas brillaban mucho y los bordes suelen formar algún tipo de dibujo. De hecho, en la Feria del Libro de Madrid, había casetas que mostraban los bordes de los libros en vez de las portadas o el lomo, lo cual me pareció rarísimo, pero entendible, viendo la tendencia.
For a brief amount of time, I was the tech lead of a software project. Before that, I thought that leading was a matter of gently telling people what to do, being open to questions and suggestions from the team, and, generally, being patient.
But the experience left me with more questions than answers. How can some people lead whole armies to their death while I couldn't even get my points across (i.e., “I'm afraid you're doing it wrong. You have to do it this way.” Or: “If you have doubts, don't waste time we don't have: Just ask.”)?
My first instinct was to think: “Well, you need to surround yourself with people who share your vision or at least are experienced enough to understand it.” But that seems like an easy way out. You can't always be surrounded by like-minded people, right?
So, how do charismatic leaders do it? Is it just that they seek idiots to manipulate? Can they really do it without some form of coercion or propaganda? I don't know.
I don't like being a boss, it's just that I usually know better what must be done or where we should go, so being a subordinate frustrates me, too.
@bonifartius Of course surveillance isn't a consequence of technology existing, that was not the point of the cartoon. The point was that whoever controls technology is not using it for the common good, but to make money, and they make money by surveilling us and exploiting workers.
For instance, delivery food was already a thing in the 1980s. Tech bros didn't invent that. What tech bros did was getting in the middle of it and making money out of both restaurants and clients while paying next to nothing to workers.
When I say Luddism is the answer I mean that we have to fight this state of affairs somehow, and a good way to fight is not to consume their shitty and unnecessary services.
(If this arrives to you, it was because I can't reply to your qoto account for some reason.)
@noyoushutthefuckupdad I'm as sensitive to feminist dog whistles as you are, but there wasn't any contempt “for all men” in the cartoon. You're imagining things, Dad.
@noyoushutthefuckupdad Last time I watched Oliver was in 2016. I don't know what he's up to these days, but being an expert with many years of experience in the field, I can confidently say that tech bros are not there to solve our problems, but only to make money, even if they have to create new problems in the process. The fact that someone you don't like said this doesn't make it any less true.
I love how the author apologises in advance for her cartoon (“It's not a call to Luddism, I promise”), but every comment is basically: “Yes! Luddism is the answer!”
(I'm a computer programmer and I agree: Luddism is the answer. Also, we need to cut out the middlemen. They're parasites.)
@prettygood You know your condition better than me, so I'll refrain from giving advice on things I know shit about from now on. I just hope you don't have to go through that again.
And, yes, cooking tasty stuff without salt is definitely a talent.
@prettygood I had a friend who went through the same thing and he said they told him the whole stone was basically salt. My father had one too years ago and he loved salty food.
That said, I'm not a doctor, but I thought it was common knowledge. Maybe I'm wrong.
@prettygood How are you doing? Did they tell you to cut on your salt consumption from now on, and all that?
@BitBun Good luck! I'm on the same situation right now. I need to leave this company I work for and I've seen how hard it is to switch these days.
When I see people who aren't concerned about their data and #privacy in general, I get angry. Specially when they say, “I don't have anything to hide”. It's like you have to have something to hide to care.
A regular website, these days, shares your data with 500+ other websites and data exchanges.
If your data weren't relevant to them, they wouldn't jump through hoops and try to find loopholes to steal your data.
Grow the fuck up and pull your head out of your ass before it's too late
@kaia Yeah, that's what I'm going to do.
@kaia At least I'm on vacation now, so I don't have to fix that shit.
I am, without a doubt, the most interesting person I know.