Show newer

@lydiaconwell
> How much of a problem is that?

To be honest, I don't know. It's a potential, more than a real, problem. What do I mean by this? Well, think about how the protocol works: when someone posts something, it gets sent to all the other instances that federate with the sending one. Once it reaches an instance, it gets delivered to whoever can read it, but we're not interested about this second part. Inter-instance delievery is what's important, because it costs bandwidth and money to admins.

The way things are now, they seem sustainable enough. But what happens if a billion+ users come in and start posting? Will the system collapse? We don't know. But it could _potentially_ happen. Myself, I'm more worried about hosting costs for small instance admins than unintended DoS attacks.

> If so, that's one hell of a flaw in the Fediverse architecture.

Not really. That's roughly how any decentralised architecture works. AP is not the best protocol ever, but it's not that bad, either.

Relays may help in mitigating this problem. (They already exist. They are like middlepoints between instances. Newly created ones usually subscribe to them to fill their timelines.) If Facebook maintained a relay or a set of them (thus bearing their cost) and they could be configured so they wouldn't flood the rest of the Fediverse, everything would continue as normal. The question is: will they do that or something to that effect?

@adamgreenfield I could (and I do) say the same about you, because what in my post made you think that I am invested in a position other than “people should resolve their differences by talking to each other instead of keeping quiet and then complaining on the Internet about stuff that they could have just misconstrued?”

Also, what in my post made you think that I'm blaming anyone for anything?

@ploum @anthk @f4grx

@ten Ok...

[Walks backwards slowly until he dissapears behind a corner and moves on with his life.]

@r000t @essie

@adamgreenfield Because RMS is known for not being exactly good at social interactions and he would have probably appreciated being told that he was being an asshole instead of being badmouthed on the Internet some time later?

Because @f4grx could have misinterpreted his intention when he told him to speak louder? Maybe RMS felt that he was being shy and wanted (misguidedly) to help him open up? (Think of the improvised poem scene in _Dead Poets Society_.)

Because understanding the other person's point of view would help him avoid these situations in the future and give him some closure?

I can think of more reasons, but I'm tired of typing the obvious.

@anthk @ploum

@essie I have to agree with @r000t here. The fact that it is, for you, a famous meme doesn't mean it is universally famous. Nothing on the Internet is universal. Everything is subculture-specific.

I'm a fan of dry humour myself and I didn't parse it as such. It just looked like some idiotic comment posted by some rando. The “I pay for games. So should you” part left me in doubt, but that wasn't enough to see it as a joke. Also, the “dont make me tap the sign” intro made me think it was copypasted by some dumbass who got the wrong meme.

A comment does not become automatically funny by being outlandish and stupid. Same with reactions. They're not funny simply because “they didn't get the joke.” Finding them thus is childish, if anything.

@louis@emacs.ch Thanks!

@Codeberg Sad that that page requires JS.

@lydiaconwell The problem is that, due to the nature of the AP protocol, a federating Meta, with its huge size and post production rate, could have the same effect as a DoS attack on all other instances.

@parker That's a lemming? It looked to me like the masthead of _One Piece_'s Going Merry.

@lina @p

@internetuserguy@mastodon.social
> it was centralized just like usenet was but way easier to use.

Usenet was completely decentralised, just like IRC, and very easy to use. You probably had a lousy client.

@ewdocparris

@lydiaconwell It doesn't work like that. Most emojis used are the same, so they are grouped. Even if there were a lot of them, you wouldn't have to scroll through them.

Besides, you could always make those replies clickable, so other people wouldn't have to dive through a list of emojis when someone else already used an appropriate one.

The worst thing I can say about anything is that it's boring. If you ever read me say that about something, you can be sure that I hated it.

josemanuel boosted
josemanuel boosted
Is there an old net movement somewhere with a website, arguments and etc?

Listening to @All_bonesJones going on about some Twitch streamer unhappy about Twitch policies and apparently Twitch staff came to talk shit in the chat and dude could not ban them or something

I suggested moving to their own website for streaming. I know it's possible to still have bits, subs, donation and co via outside services too

Also, as far as I know, a lot of youtubers already doesn't rely on ads, they rely on outside subs, and they might be entirely demonetized already anyways

IMO it's about time a lot of people just go old school and start moving their shit on personal websites already

@mangeurdenuage Been there, done that. But by the time Toradora came out, torrents and direct downloads were a better alternative.

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.