皆様へのご報告です。僕はこの度、博士課程を辞めることにしました。
経済学を今でも心底から愛しています。しかし、課程を進めていく中、自分が余りにも研究者に向いていないこと、また、研究的な思考に捉われ過ぎると、生身の人間が見えなくなってしまうことに気付きました。二年間迷い続けた末、この結論に辿り着きました。
当分の間、学校に居座りますが、このモラトリアム期間を大事に使わせて頂きます。今後はなるべく自分と向き合い、より誠実に生きていきたい所存です。
今まで誠に有難うございました。皆様から頂いたお助けやご応援、決して忘れることはございません。これからは少し違う世界を生きることになるかも知れませんが、どうか引き続き、宜しくお願い致します。
R より
Dear friends,
Hi. Following the recent leadership change of Twitter, I have decided to move my personal/academic account to Fediverse.
If you want to read my posts without a Fedi account, you can simply open in your browser:
https://qoto.org/@leiqiongwan
or add to your RSS reader:
https://qoto.org/@leiqiongwan.rss
皆様へのご報告です。僕はこの度、博士課程を辞めることにしました。
経済学を今でも心底から愛しています。しかし、課程を進めていく中、自分が余りにも研究者に向いていないこと、また、研究的な思考に捉われ過ぎると、生身の人間が見えなくなってしまうことに気付きました。二年間迷い続けた末、この結論に辿り着きました。
当分の間、学校に居座りますが、このモラトリアム期間を大事に使わせて頂きます。今後はなるべく自分と向き合い、より誠実に生きていきたい所存です。
今まで誠に有難うございました。皆様から頂いたお助けやご応援、決して忘れることはございません。これからは少し違う世界を生きることになるかも知れませんが、どうか引き続き、宜しくお願い致します。
R より
Non-native English scientists need:
- 91% more time to read a paper in English
- 51% more time to write their own paper
- Their papers will be rejected 2.6 times more often by journals
- If accepted, they'll have to revise it 12.5 more times
Can the U.S. See the Truth About China? - The New York Times
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/03/27/magazine/keyu-jin-interview.html
Obviously we are different species of economists. And different species of Chinese. Looks real bad, two thumbs down.
100 visualizations of the same small dataset: https://100.datavizproject.com/
In tomorrow's Econ & machine learning reading group, we will finish our discussion of "Prediction, Learning, and Games."
A book w many deep results on adversarial online learning, multi-armed bandits & the connections between learning and games.
The three-essay dissertation as an alternative to the current model : AcademicPhilosophy
https://www.reddit.com/r/AcademicPhilosophy/comments/32jpju/the_threeessay_dissertation_as_an_alternative_to/
It is fascinating how many working papers get cited every year while the primary premise of academia that I was told seems to be peer review…
I saw a meme on tumblr earlier that said the best response to “Can you explain this gap in your resume” is “No I signed an NDA”
'Everybody is cheating': Why this teacher has adopted an open ChatGPT policy : NPR
https://www.npr.org/2023/01/26/1151499213/chatgpt-ai-education-cheating-classroom-wharton-school
I cannot accept friendship from a prof who does not even respect our professional relationship.
This is a super fun tool for sketching out rough priors on things: https://statdist.com/
@paulgp Before you run any models... explore the data, visualize it, summarize it, and learn about the context (especially if some of what you are seeing doesn't align with your priors). This may be a no brainier but in grad school it seemed we quite often skipped straight to "here's how you use/estimate this model."
In the past semester, for one rather essay-oriented course, I tried to be a helpful TA by covering as much of those topics as possible, but this is not something that one or a few TAs could possibly solve.
During my undergrad in Japan, there was this one-semester course, I think it was during the first year (of a four-year programme), about how to present, write essays, and cite, as well as semi-compulsory library sessions on reference management systems. I am kinda shocked to find out that a similar writing course is offered here only for the final year students as a dissertation consultation. Way too late.