@hj @SuperDicq I've heard people make that claim before. why are private companies better than public ones?
@hj @SuperDicq @light@noc.social
>Who are the shareholders? Rich people who can afford to buy shares, NOT customers or people interested in company's actual product.
Sounds like a great argument for co-operatives.
A company (as opposed to a non-profit) is always going to be owned by people who care about profit (even if it's a co-op). I still don't understand what difference it makes whether the business is owned by a closed group of, idk, the founder, their family, and friends or an open group of anyone with enough money to pay for stock.
If it's, say, a customer co-op though, then it should act in the interests of customers.
I don't really understand what democracy has to do with it. Is your claim that more people making decisions makes it worse? How? Either way it's orthogonal to your argument that the profit motive is a problem.