"3 Degrees More" https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-58144-1
- Shows the consequences of a global warming of +3°C
- Demonstrates that we still have it in our hands to ensure that global warming is limited to at least +2°C
- Details the plan of what politically feasible, cost-effective measures should now be taken
- This book is open access, which means that you have free and unlimited access
What's amazing to me about this article/study is that after discovering mentions of "AI" make people less interested in products, their recommendation is "so you should not call attention to the AI in your marketing". The idea of simply *not doing* the thing that people don't want is apparently never considered. We cannot conceive of a way of constructing software other than "develop for the investors" https://xoxo.zone/@vwampage/112881383051537497
If computer hardware innovation frozes today we would still have decades before we exhaust all possible performance improvements on software.
The software industry needs to smart up. The free ride has been terribly wasteful and harmful to the planet. Update cycles needs to slow down and we need to relearn how to code with performance in mind.
"One crawler downloaded 73 TB of zipped HTML files in May 2024, with almost 10 TB in a single day. This cost us over $5,000 in bandwidth charges, and we had to block the crawler. We emailed this company, reporting a bug in their crawler, and we're working with them on reimbursing us for the costs."
https://about.readthedocs.com/blog/2024/07/ai-crawlers-abuse/
Seeing some #fieldtelephone stuff here again, which brought up an older thought again
Are there any DIY field telephone kits/PCBs/schematics out there, possibly open source hardware?
I know there are schematics for most field telephones out there but it doesn’t seem like parts would be easily available. I was thinking of something like a PCB you could just plug a POTS phone receiver into. Anyone ever seen something like that? Or do I have to keep it on my project list 😅
@KevinMarks Hmm, it's almost as if the people who organise their life around the relentless pursuit of resource acquisition at all costs are not the people whose control over capital provides the greatest societal benefit.
Reporting of the latest UBI test programme is ignoring the key finding, obvious to anyone who knows low income people, that their first impulse was to spread the wealth to others.
This thinking is so alien to economists and financial types that they barely discuss it. https://www.openresearchlab.org/findings/key-findings-spending
For all the talk of AI replacing everything, today proves the value of a solid technical support person that can leg it around the building getting things done. The least fashionable role in IT was the most important. The worker.
#Crowdstrike
Drastic budget cuts for FOSS, by the EU, and the explanation given is that "because lots of budget are allocated to AI, there is not much left for Internet infrastructure". https://www.theregister.com/2024/07/17/foss_funding_vanishes_from_eus/ So here is one more way that the fever over "AI" bullshit does real harm. Infra projects that protect security, privacy, and other vital needs will be underfunded so that more money can be thrown into the "AI" black hole. Sigh.
I was supposed to get a call from a reporter to talk about space junk right after the goat sale, but he just emailed to say that Toronto is flooding and he just got off the phone with Weather Canada and has to write that up right now.
Which is so extremely 2024: "Sorry I can't do the interview about garbage that billionaires dropped on you from orbit, climate change is causing too many problems in my city right now"
I think reasonable people can disagree on the nuances of privacy engineering here...you can get really in the weeds of epsilons and trust boundaries.
Mozilla need to understand that that isn't what is happening here.
The fact is this is a new data gathering vector, it doesn't matter how privacy-preserving it is, it should be subject to *new, informed, and proactive* consent - rather than being automatically enrolled in an experiment.
Two updates to this thread.
Update 1: In this thread I complain Mozilla does not provide specific technical details about this feature. It turns out there *is* a document with the technical details, on Github:
https://github.com/mozilla/explainers/tree/main/ppa-experiment
It also explains (https://wiki.mozilla.org/Origin_Trials) which sites are participating in the feature.
I am linking this document because I believe the first five words do more to discredit what Mozilla is doing here than anything I could say:
"Mozilla is working with Meta"
According to https://httparchive.org/reports/page-weight, the median weight in KB for desktop:
126 months:
HTML
2010: 20KB;
mid 2024: 33KB;
Increase of 65%.
Images
2010: 229KB;
mid 2024: 1,062KB;
Increase of 464%.
JavaScript
2010: 89KB;
mid 2024: 640KB;
Increase of 719%.
- - -
107 months:
Video
mid 2015: 173KB;
mid 2024: 3,872KB;
Increase of 2,238%.
I reckon that in the era of AI the JS gradient is gonna steepen significantly
Extremely online electronics engineer, PhD in #microelectronics (low-power digital systems architecture), #LoRa pioneer.
Co-founded a #hackerspace, co-founded an industrial #company, interested in #manufacturing (traditional and distributed), frugal innovation, durable and resilient sociotechnical systems.