Napoleon Legal [automatic bot] @napoleonlegal_bot@qoto.org

RT @Napoleonlegal
How many times can Communists/Communist sympathizers suck out of the woodwork a 35 year old ACCUSATION of "bad man" and have you eat it up And THEN ASK FOR MORE like the urchin Oliver Twist: THIS IS YOU: "Please sir, may I have some more." What is wrong with you? (rhetorical)

RT @Napoleonlegal
So much so, that even EXPRESSING THAT FACT will arouse the enmity of the enforcers. On the count of 3, get out your label makers and spit out the label HOMOPHOBE. Don't you folks resent being used like canon fodder by the shadow dwellers who don't care for any of this?

RT @Napoleonlegal
Like, for example, how many times can a decades old allegation of sexual (god forbid THAT ANY person engage in ANY expression of sexuality UNLESS it is...AND BUCKLE UP, it is a homoerotic one. Admit it, please: ANY homoerotic expression of sexuality is sacrosanct and protected

RT @Napoleonlegal
I am continually offended by my former employer's exploitation of progressives when, and I am acutely aware of this fact, progressives don't seem to mind at all. Of course, that is how good my former employers are. They make the poison taste good.

RT @Napoleonlegal
Baby humans CANNOT be reared successfully absent the complementary model. Look, I know how those of you raised absent the complementary model HAVE TO rail against experts like myself in order to justify your existence. Talk to someone about this because there is another approach

RT @Napoleonlegal
You bastards who plagiarize my work will you please give credit when you write your God forsaken books which STEAL my ideas SO THAT, if one of your readers wants to read the intelligent version and not the 8th grade version they can look up why work? Will you do that?

RT @Napoleonlegal
So your masters socially engineered sadness to replace natures complimentary model. Complementary models are used throughout nature and is the ONLY way an biopsychosocial system of reproduction can work. Interlude:

RT @Napoleonlegal
Once the Sabots were thrown into the 18th century French rail system the SABO teurs (see what you can learn if you are not a peacock or misadrist/competitive shrew?) knew the trains would stop but they didn't know all the other benefits

RT @Napoleonlegal
Since I have special awareness of and specific 1st hand knowledge of the primary raison d'être for the PSYOPs designed to make reproduction between Europeans almost impossible, the secondary benefits to your masters were allowed for but not planned, per se

RT @Napoleonlegal
The DEMS in the modern era were against child labor, ZERO worker protections, a living wage and medical care. Communists KEPT the label DEMOCRATIC even though what was once the party of Sam Nunn and Henry Jackson is now the party of Lenin and Trotsky. Those are just facts

RT @Napoleonlegal
was able to take over the once good Democratic Party (IF you are a low level dupe on the other end you'll feel the need to mouth off about the sins of the DEM party going as far back as your masters have allowed you to know)

RT @Napoleonlegal
I am surprised at how easily the International Communist Party (your revulsion to my use of the accurate term was inculcated into you by the people who used Sen. McCarthy to reify their PSYOP)

RT @Napoleonlegal
My message is for ALL the others who, like always (I am so disappointed by this but am not surprised) MOST people want a leg up, want to feel superior and it really is a major defect in human kind)

RT @Napoleonlegal
Your designers chose you.......don't take it personally, you were not CHOSEN a priori because you were special to begin with, you were made SPECIAL by your designers. I now have to say that because ego maniacs have taken my descriptors as confirmation that "man, I'm something." https://twitter.com/BFleming101/status/893576501890871296

RT @Neoavatara
Where in Dowd admits he doesn't give a damn about due process. https://twitter.com/matthewjdowd/status/1041785678785339392

RT @Napoleonlegal
Scientists MUST disclose their conflicts of interest when they seek to publish in a peer reviewed journal, e.g., who paid for the study, any stock investments, family ties, you name it. Let's try that tried and true principle when it comes to the lady with 3 names accusing K.

RT @andibeth012
UPDATEBEAUTIFUL 'BELLA' IS SAFE 9/15RESCUED DON'T KNOW NAME! WHO CARES SHE'S OUT OF #RIVERSIDE #ACC HI KILL FACILITY! YESSSS! THIS INNOCENT ABUSED OVER BRED #PITTIE GOES TO A LOVING 4EVERPLEASE SHARE THE JOY! THX FOR CARING & RTS! https://twitter.com/andibeth012/status/1039918861645111296

RT @ANCA_DC
Where do @Google and @YouTube / @YouTubeTV draw the line on #genocide denial?

#Armenian #Genocide #ArmenianGenocide

RT @peta2
RT if you know dogs are family, NOT OBJECTS

RT @Napoleonlegal
By the way..............the PRIMARY reason few if any of you ever really care ABOUT my protestations over plagiarism is this: That is what you do, you steal and then present it as original cause.........well, that is what you do.