Bluesky needs to commit to respecting creators and their work. Not to censor them for nonsense puritanical reasons #FreeSpeech
https://www.techdirt.com/2024/12/20/fifth-circuit-salesforce-cant-use-section-230-to-get-out-of-sex-trafficking-case-because-it-only-provided-crm-software-not-content-moderation/ Stupid ruling from the Fifth Circuit which drags out frivolous lawsuits for longer.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIB53GK0rKY A parody where Luigi is the one punch man.
There's an issue which I've been discussing for a while now with Big Tech platforms where free speech discourse turns into discussions over this high profile user or that high profile user.
Meanwhile, there are countless other people being censored.
Excuse me if that is a bit snappy, it's honestly boring looking at that site and seeing the *same very reaching bad take* ignoring the obvious alternate explanations.
"planned monetization features for creators"
Speaking as a commentator on financial censorship issues, it'd be absolutely insane to use Bluesky as a creator platform, especially with the extreme puritanical censorship we have heard about. Strong recommendation against. #FreeSpeech
With a few of these companies, they weren't always so bad, they got worse later. In this case, it's far clearer where it seems to be going, and it's not a place you'd want to go.
While I think other companies should improve, and better protect the freedom of expression of their users, I have no confidence this company won't do something bizarre and incoherent for some strange reason.
Software Engineer. Psy / Tech / Sex Science Enthusiast. Controversial?
Free Expression. Human rights / Civil Liberties. Anime. Liberal.