Olives @olives@qoto.org

https://torrentfreak.com/disclosure-of-pirates-identities-compatible-with-eu-privacy-laws-230929/ I don't think this sort of surveillance is worth it to fight something as petty as copyright infringement.

https://nichegamer.com/kick-streamer-johnny-somali-criminally-charged-in-japan/

"On the 2nd, the Osaka District Public Prosecutors Office charged Ismael Ramsey Khalid (24), a.k.a. Johnny Somali, a U.S. citizen who caused a nuisance at a restaurant in Minami, Osaka, with forceful obstruction of business. Indicted."

"The streamer was most recently arrested when he trespassed on a construction site. Somali became infamous on the internet after he allegedly harassed women in Japan and taunted Japanese citizens"

https://therecord.media/eu-urged-to-drop-law-website-authentication-certificates

"A similar joint letter has been sent by industry organizations — including the Linux Foundation, Cloudflare, and Mozilla — telling the EU lawmakers that the proposed regulations are a “dangerous intervention” that risk breaking the fragile system of trust that underpins the use of cryptographic certificates on the web."

"Such cases of abuse have been documented, most infamously in the DigiNotar case when the Dutch certificate authority was hacked allowing the attackers to intercept communications between Google and Iranian Google users. Similar cases have affected companies including Comodo and GlobalSign, as the cybersecurity researchers write."

#eidas #chatcontrol

https://www.jeremiahlee.com/posts/2023-eu-eidas-feedback/

"New legislative articles, introduced in recent closed-door meetings and not yet public, envision that all web browsers distributed in Europe will be required to trust the certificate authorities and cryptographic keys selected by EU governments."

#eidas #chatcontrol

It would be very, very bad, if it were about pornography.

Speaking of which, there is a fair bit of rubbish on this site, such as "AGI is only a step away".

https://futurism.com/the-byte/anti-ai-camera-journalists-deepfakes I hope there aren't any privacy implications to this.

I've been reading some of the "think of the children" literature. It's a lot like you hear of "this" or "that" which might be bad and play it up. The document speaks in a primarily shrill paranoid tone.

Some of the language is quite alarming. When speaking of sexting among peers, participants are referred to as simultaneously "perpetrators" and "victims" (emotionally charged language). Someone can't simply be engaging in an activity considered inappropriate.

They talk of content in terms of contagions which inevitably lead to "harm" (a vague term which could mean something as simple as unpleasantness). This is not really true. It's also a very paranoid way to look at the world.

Online porn gets a mention, even though this is pretty moral panicky (1) (honestly, all of it is, but it's not as if we haven't had porn crop up multiple times as a moral panic over the decades).

Even auto-complete gets mentioned as an "evil feature"... There doesn't seem to be a lower bar as to what they're willing to include as an "evil feature".

Quite a few suggestions require somehow knowing someone is a minor... That requires collecting data... Unclear whether they're helpful, they look a lot like random ideas.

It implies that livestreams are commonly visible to millions of people. This might be true, if you're a large influencer. But, you know... We'd be lucky, if we got any (or barely any) watching a livestream, without a pre-established fanbase.

1 https://qoto.org/@olives/111083302650803082

https://mullvad.net/en/blog/2023/11/2/eu-digital-identity-framework-eidas-another-kind-of-chat-control/

"Articles 45 and 45a stipulate that web browsers must recognise a new form of certificate issued by any EU state has , potentially compromising the encryption and most of all trust and overall security of the web."

#eidas #chatcontrol

Another disturbing proposal...

https://last-chance-for-eidas.org

"These changes radically expand the capability of EU governments to surveil their citizens by ensuring cryptographic keys under government control can be used to intercept encrypted web traffic across the EU. Any EU member state has the ability to designate cryptographic keys for distribution in web browsers and browsers are forbidden from revoking trust in these keys without government permission. "

Anyone who opposes #chatcontrol should also be wary of #eidas which could be used to usher in mass surveillance.

https://mullvad.net/en/blog/2023/11/2/eu-digital-identity-framework-eidas-another-kind-of-chat-control/ Yes... It does seem to have the same sorts of problems...

While a company's moderation practices might be imperfect, it still doesn't help to put lots of pressure on them to "take more bad things down", when that is likely to lead to them also taking down legitimate content.

https://reason.com/2023/10/31/daniel-radcliffe-gets-to-be-an-auctioneer-thanks-to-licensing-reform/ What do you think of this?

I suspect if there were mental health issues associated with social media, it would probably come in the form of bad news. Suppressing news would come with it's own issues though, and I don't think you'd want someone to be ignorant.

Hmm... Maybe, if the chained up bicycle is an obstacle to other people moving around (or it's abandoned for days or weeks), then it might make sense.