https://www.badinternetbills.com/ Apparently, you need to contact your lawmakers to oppose #KOSA again.
This is my breakdown of the "experts" on the list:
U.S. academic I don't know a whole lot about. Haven't heard of him, though keep in mind that Ylva might be taking his input and tossing it in the trash. In fact, this likely applies to many of these, she's probably just picking things she can use to justify her proposal.
U.S. academic associated with Microsoft.
U.S. academic who used to work for FB / associated with government.
European academic who opposes the chat control.
Nine from two U.S. Big Tech firms.
One NZ tech company.
Five Thorn trying to sell their software.
Four pseudo-governmental. Nominal NGOs deputized to carry out police / government functions.
Seven governmental / police.
Two spooks (CIA / NSA type agencies).
"I can't believe Stamos is on the list."
In hindsight, he was always like "I support E2EE but... I don't think you should deploy it anywhere where it might be useful."
Also, telling privacy activists off for being upset about the government wanting to spy on people, and trying to guilt trip (emotionally manipulate) someone by picking out a disturbing story.
"The First Amendment provides broad protections for journalists, not only as to what they publish, but also how they collect information. For instance, publishing leaked government documents is protected, even if the acts that provided journalists with these documents may be subject to criminal proceedings."
Remember kids, there's a pernicious reason why #Google redirects "http://maps.google.com" to "http://google.com/maps".
Because of this redirect, the location permission that you grant to Google Maps also automatically becomes available to Google Search - making your search queries more valuable to advertisers.
https://www.thepinknews.com/2023/11/03/us-town-public-art-ban/
"A town in the US is genuinely considering a ban on all public art because some of the art might be gay or promote LGBTQ+ ideals."
@faustosterling https://indianapublicmedia.org/news/researchers-decry-admin-plan-to-sever-kinsey-institute-from-iu.php
https://www.change.org/p/support-the-kinsey-institute-and-collections
https://www.npr.org/2023/11/09/1211949718/the-kinsey-institute-faces-possible-separation-from-indiana-university
Now, this is happening.
https://pen.org/press-release/pen-america-responds-to-defunding-of-kinsey-institute-as-another-alarming-step-in-effort-to-exert-political-control-over-higher-education/ Republican Indiana House votes to defund #Kinsey Institute at Indiana University.
https://www.change.org/p/support-the-kinsey-institute-and-collections The change.org petition in support of the #KinseyInstitute seems to be up to 8k signatures. #kinsey
"Indiana University trustees will decide whether to partially sever the University's long standing ties with the famous organization."
"Defunding became a reality earlier this year when freshman Republican Representative Lorissa Sweet pushed a successful amendment to cut any state funds for #Kinsey. She claimed that Kinsey researchers are conducting sexual experiments on children."
"Democrat Matt Pierce, who represents the district where Indiana University is located, said those false claims have long been debunked."
I'll put this on hashtags (someone requested that) but I don't think they're active.
"Indiana University trustees will decide whether to partially sever the University's long standing ties with the famous organization."
"Defunding became a reality earlier this year when freshman Republican Representative Lorissa Sweet pushed a successful amendment to cut any state funds for Kinsey. She claimed that Kinsey researchers are conducting sexual experiments on children."
"Democrat Matt Pierce, who represents the district where Indiana University is located, said those false claims have long been debunked."
"Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers."
The name refers to Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
https://www.article19.org/resources/the-gambia-crackdown-on-free-speech-must-stop/
"The recent prosecutions of journalist Alhagie Bora and activist Madi Jorbateh, along with President Adama Barrow’s comments expressing hostility toward media freedom, have sparked alarm regarding the state of freedom of expression in The Gambia, which had been on a positive track since President Yahya Jammeh’s leadership came to an end in 2017."
Article 19 seems more international in their scope than some other free speech groups.
https://www.article19.org/resources/denmark-scrap-law-on-improper-treatment-of-religious-writings/
"ARTICLE 19 remains concerned that, despite some minor alterations in Denmark’s draft blasphemy law, the proposal continues to pose significant danger to the right to freedom of expression, including political speech and artistic performances. As we have outlined previously, the draft law does not meet the requirements of international human rights law, which does not grant protection to abstract notions such as religions or religious feelings. We reiterate our call on the Danish Government to immediately withdraw the legislative proposal and refrain from introducing similar laws in the future."
Free speech group Article 19 concerned about draft Danish law.
https://necessaryandproportionate.org Interesting, though I'd put that as a floor, not a ceiling, as there are clever ways to twist the language, especially if someone refers to unreliable sources.
Small update but it doesn't really change the core message.
For the record, it is *never* good to just rely on a politician to protect your rights. Courts aren't perfect either but especially not a politician.
Also, activism against incursions on free expression, privacy, due process, and so forth is important.
Software Engineer. Psy / Tech / Sex Science Enthusiast. Controversial?
Free Expression. Human rights / Civil Liberties. Anime. Liberal.