Olives @olives@qoto.org

While I think other companies should improve, and better protect the freedom of expression of their users, I have no confidence this company won't do something bizarre and incoherent for some strange reason.

Even though there are other companies which are weird and censorious, I haven't heard about as much wacky nonsense with them as I have heard of over the past week about Bluesky's moderation team.

Apparently, there are even inexplicable anti-furry posts.

I encountered a weird bug so I posted this again instead of boosting it.

https://protectthestack.org Protect The Stack is important reading for infrastructure issues.

I'll keep my other thread in more general terms though, because I'd like to avoid making assumptions on specifics here.

The days when Q just meant a powerful alien from Star Trek.

Even innocuous language, that is written without regard for practical implementation could be over-read.

Not that long ago, we were being told that everything in Taiwan was going great. Meanwhile, the legislature is breaking out into a brawl over a few controversial bills.

https://focustaiwan.tw/politics/202412200006 Meanwhile in Taiwan.

A mask ban is particularly silly in a subway. I could see diseases spreading there.

Apparently, the U.S. Congress was also concerned about Visa / MasterCard financial censorship around a month ago.

But, there is also a question of what someone actually wants them to do about it.

If you remember the case with Stripe from a decade ago though, a financial firm used some weird language, rather than just saying they meant real bestiality and stuff.

I think it's that sort of language which is confusing these firms.

There is another issue with MSC type marketing. It is likely to cause confusion and paranoia in a "pre-crime" type way. The science also isn't sufficient. I'd be similarly suspicious of Shore.

Big Tech could fart and someone might ask what deep and profound meaning the fart might have.

What I'm honestly finding rather strange is the propensity of a few people on Bluesky to just make things up when they don't know. It's almost as if I'm dealing with ChatGPT.

I'm seeing a strange Bluesky conspiracy as to why a platform might adhere too much to Tanner.

In Facebook's case, it actually turned out to be a matter of convenience, rather than it being some hard legal standard, and they even admitted it wasn't a great tool. What they tried to go for was a uniform standard.

It also wasn't used for removing content, it was used for reporting it.

There is no law or regulation which requires Bluesky to behave how they have been behaving. Quit apologizing for them.