The Joint Research Centre of the European Commission produced a disturbingly totalitarian report in 2022 which flew under the radar.
"The objective of the BC4T project is to investigate possible applications of blockchain (BC) technology on road transport, focusing on topics of interest to the European Commission’s policy agenda."
"The study also showed that sharing vehicle information such as fuel consumption or emissions to a fully BC-based monitoring system would be technically feasible."
"Adopting a European Digital Identity could open up a range of diverse applications within the connected mobility ecosystem linking users and regulators while protecting personal data and privacy. The benefits of the adoption and testing of BC could create a significant and transparent interlinking of public and private data and enable interoperability across different transport systems."
Honestly, people criticizing training AIs on copyrighted material is better than someone holding the same opinion, but instead trying to swat companies for things which don't really matter, like what if it generates an image of Mickey with a knife.
There is nothing wrong with someone creating an artwork that has elements of violence to it.
My opinion is more nuanced than just "You should use Substack", in fact I think you shouldn't use Substack (self-host, if possible), but I don't see the value in piling onto platforms either because of apparently a few very unpleasant accounts (when historically that hasn't gone anywhere good).
Of course, like Elizabeth, I also have to question whether nit-picking a few accounts posting, alright, very offensive content, isn't doing a disservice to free expression (particularly when you consider how over the top Big Tech has gone). Is it really contributing?
Setting policies, quietly "reinterpreting policies" (to avoid the embarrassment of publicly backing down), these are like Big Tech shenanigans, and not particularly fun ones.
It's not even particularly good for free speech. The approach of the neutral hoster might be better (and would include things related to sex) than acting as if they're out there to save journalism.
It's also the sort of platform that is entirely optional.
At the end of the day, Substack is a blog hosting platform too. A blog is far easier to self-host than any of these other things.
It's not really clear why someone really needs yet another middleman coming along here. It's even less clear when using that middleman involves getting dragged into that middleman's own political drama.
At the end of the day, someone just wants to host a blog. Why so many games?
In fact, looking at the current dance going on, it seems like the same sort of political games which you had going on with Big Tech.
Perhaps, it's time to skip the games and exit early onto something that you can control yourself.
Commenting on U.N. / Senegalese silliness this time.
The term "mere representation" is extremely suspicious and should be deleted. There is no legitimate purpose for this whatsoever.
The term "realistic" is somewhat suspicious and likely problematic (i.e. chasing fictional scenarios). Something needs to be done about this.
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/10/eff-and-45-organizations-tell-un-reverse-decision-host-igf-saudi-arabia
@eff seems to agree with me that hosting the #IGF in Saudi Arabia is a bad idea.
https://web.archive.org/web/20240106034714/https://indico.un.org/event/1009455/
https://web.archive.org/web/20231114005554/https://www.intgovforum.org/en/content/mag-2024-members
The next #IGF (an internet policy event hosted by the U.N.) is being held in Saudi Arabia, a country known for brutal repression and chopping critical journalists up into tiny little pieces.
Talk about out of touch.
You might remember the IGF from this critique of Kadokawa.
https://web.archive.org/web/20231227071126/https://www.iso.org/standard/81467.html
Nothing like a standards organization like ISO engaging in silly virtue signalling, like telling you what "SDGs" this supposedly "contributes towards" (this seems to be done in a "this vaguely intersects with this, let's toss it in" manner). Also, is it ethical to charge for these standards?
"Last week, in response to a Freedom of Information Act request by Houston lawyer Matthew Zorn, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) revealed the rationale for its August 2023 recommendation that the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) move marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III of the Controlled Substances Act."
Someone's past antics as minors (on social media) potentially being used against them is a pretty good argument for why people should value their #privacy more.
Well, less humorously, robomanagers may well be more of a thing (and that might not necessarily be a good thing).
https://themessenger.com/news/florida-school-district-dictionaries-escambia-county-sex-ed
"A school district in Florida has taken dictionaries off its libraries' shelves because of fears they violate the state's recent legislation on books depicting or describing sexual conduct."
I don't know whether to laugh at this because of the sheer absurdity of it or complain about it. Both?
Software Engineer. Psy / Tech / Sex Science Enthusiast. Controversial?
Free Expression. Human rights / Civil Liberties. Anime. Liberal.