Show newer
Olives boosted

It goes without saying that this could quite literally get people killed (in fact, I think people underestimate the potential for privacy violations to lead to such outcomes).

Olives  
https://reclaimthenet.org/russia-rolls-out-vpn-ban-nationwide "The Russian government is employing an increasingly strict approach to manage and re...

reclaimthenet.org/russia-rolls
"The Russian government is employing an increasingly strict approach to manage and rein in the digital freedom its citizens have enjoyed in recent years by introducing a ban on VPN services."

reclaimthenet.org/bc-withholds
"The authorities in Canada’s British Columbia (BC) province have changed a restaurant’s liquor license as a form of punishment after a row over its refusal to automatically surrender all surveillance footage to the police, in the wake of shooting incidents in a nearby parking lot."

"“For a local business to insist that the RCMP get a warrant for information that they might have that could lead to an arrest is outrageous,” Stewart is quoted as telling the Canadian media.

And the mayor shared that the restaurant wanting to go through what turns out to be proper legal procedure (the RCMP had to go and get a warrant) was something he was struggling to comprehend."
Well, if someone asks for a warrant, they've got to provide a warrant, that is how it works. Good grief.

Banning sex robots or whatever they want to do is one of the dumbest ideas I've heard, and you have to wonder why someone is fixated on it, of all things.

@Melpomene@erisly.social Someone keeps trying to suggest that "transparency" is some sort of silver bullet to being censored by a platform. It's honestly an annoying deflection from valid concerns about censorship. Your point is at least more principled and direct. No beating around the bush.

As for their censorship, I think they listened too much to an infamous group of Christian fundamentalists, particularly when it comes to sexual expression.

What pundits think platform moderation is about: Hate speech, abuse.

What it is actually about: You cursed in this video, how dare you. I don't like this piece of art. You said the word "sex". You said the word "dead". Spam.

"transparency" about how a moderation decision was made (i.e. was it an algorithm?) is probably nice but it is no substitute for a platform not censoring you.

It's interesting how Ylva claimed the "interim regulation" would "expire", if they did not pass her awful one, and the moment her efforts faltered, they rushed to pass a new "interim regulation".

insidehighered.com/news/quick-
"The Indiana University Board of Trustees unanimously agreed Friday to jettison a controversial proposal to spin off part of the Institute as a nonprofit.

The proposal came after the Republican-dominated Indiana General Assembly passed a state budget in spring 2023 banning the historic sex research institute from receiving state funds."

"But faculty members publicly expressed fears that such a change might mean losing their affiliations with the institute and could threaten, among other things, the institute’s extensive sex, gender and erotica collections, which span more than 2,000 years of history."

@ilumium There being things you like doesn't make it not a pretty brazen censorship bill.

At it's core, it encourages censorship.

And if we look at the case of Thierry, one platform simply responded by suppressing sexual content, when Thierry complained about violence or something. That is because they lump that in as "bad content".

I could also see art being censored, among other things. I don't think they'd be better at dealing with actual abuse though.

Big Tech is not known for making particularly thoughtful or nuanced decisions (governments are also known for being censorious...).

reason.com/2024/03/06/after-17
"Seventeen years ago, the federal government raided Charlie Lynch's medical marijuana dispensary in Morro Bay, California, and charged him with five drug felonies. Lynch, whose business complied with state and local regulations, has been fighting to stay out of prison ever since, and last month he finally won that battle.

The Department of Justice (DOJ), which had been insisting since the first iPhone was released that Lynch should be incarcerated for at least five years, suddenly agreed to a deal that will spare him that punishment and erase his criminal record."

What Nintendo seems to miss is that things like emulators have historically been tools someone uses to make it easier to, say, record / upload video footage, so they might actually be harming themselves by depriving themselves of publicity.

Olives boosted

natlawreview.com/article/us-de
"The proposed rule requires all U.S. providers of U.S. IaaS products to create, implement, and maintain an appropriately tailored, written CIP—akin to the “know your customer” (“KYC”) information that banks maintain. The primary purpose of the CIP is to verify whether potential customers and beneficial owners are foreign or U.S. persons, and to verify the identities of potential foreign customers and their beneficial owners."
This sounds like a huge invasion of with flimsy pretences.

Olives boosted
Olives boosted

reclaimthenet.org/court-confir
"A court has ruled that the reaction (in this case, YouTube) video “genre” represents fair use under rules"

Olives boosted

If something can be done locally on a device, it shouldn't be done remotely in a "cloud". Good heuristic for better privacy, security, and to avoid surprising users in nasty ways.

chatcontrol, live 

@maxim

qoto.org/@olives/1119049747631
A post of mine about how this could turn into a "War on Drugs" type fishing expedition (threatening free expression, privacy, and due process). Those are my main concerns.

qoto.org/@olives/1118889463563
I also suspect she has a fundamentally flawed view of porn, so there's some scientific citations and things I know about how porn isn't bad.

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.