If I start writing a blog, maybe I'll go a bit into this form of journalism, although honestly, I think it might be going downhill.
Vice went bankrupt.
Gawker's domain has expired.
"blasting into the ether"
Perhaps, a better way of putting it is that it's a lot like treating articles like shells in a barrel. They are fired off and not revisited. And then, they move onto firing more shots.
Unfortunately, this style of "journalism" has created the impression that this is how journalism is done, and you get copycat blogs like "404" (Vice inspired) which similarly blast content into the ether.
I've seen people rely on a couple of articles from the Vice Blog, but it's important to remember that they did not retract articles (or corrected them shortly after posting them), and they primarily shared current affairs without a lot of curation.
This is one reason why I don't use them as a source (although, I think Vice has gone bankrupt more recently).
"404". Vice News (the website, they used to be more honest by stating that it was a blog). Substack.
Notice that Alice: Madness Returns was released over a decade ago and it has abruptly been banned.
This isn't the main point of the post though, so I don't comment on that specifically. I think it's kind of common sense though.
For potentially relevant context as to why Vice World News might have run that particular article that particular way though, in the U.K. in the 90s, there was a mass shooting where dozens of kids were massacred, and the shooter blamed being hounded by the media.
We also have to ask whether part of the media's fascination with this strange guy played a role in the rise of QAnon like ideologies (a form of far right extremism) in the U.K. The guy himself has always been an irrelevant figure but the media's reporting on him might inflate his perceived relevance.
Software Engineer. Psy / Tech / Sex Science Enthusiast. Controversial?
Free Expression. Human rights / Civil Liberties. Anime. Liberal.