Olives @olives@qoto.org

Someone talking about ChatGPT as if it is an interface for doing any sort of security sensitive interaction is straight-up bizarre.

Obviously, that would be a terrible idea, especially as the thing doesn't even work reliably. Is this another symptom of a hype cycle?

Everyone suddenly discovers that Reddit is run by an asshole.

Maybe, I should say "LLM" instead of "AI" because that suggests this thing has anything which remotely resembles intelligence.

An AI chat bubble to replace a blockchain bubble as a miracle tool which can do anything.

https://www.axios.com/local/new-orleans/2023/06/16/louisiana-cyberattack-dmv-moveit If you want an idea of how much you can trust the government to keep your age verification data safe.

YouTube, Reddit, and Twitter appear to be doing the same thing. They all decided to start cutting off third party apps which added value to their platforms.

In a way, the fall of Reddit might breathe more life into the open web, because Reddit itself is a large bottleneck, and the communities are far more severable than in some social network.

Better security means fewer spambots because they can get fewer machines as slaves.

As far as I know, a lot of spammers use botnets. That is a computer infected with a computer virus to follow someone else's command.

I honestly trust Google more than I do the center the E.U. is building for Chat Stasi and their "lists".

If you have trouble with spambots, I have a fair bit of knowledge and experience of spambots, and how to deal with them effectively.

To a large extent, privacy is security and collecting less data means not ending up being humiliated in the same way Adobe once was. It also means not upsetting the more local FTC, if someone is large enough for them to care about a breach.

"GDPR compliance" (minus the cookie parts) is kind of just an extension of what someone should be doing anyway.

I wonder if the E.U. even realizes that one reason the GDPR is probably popular is less because the E.U. can go into a country they have no jurisdiction (or power) over and more because "GDPR Compliant" is a good marketing strategy.

Different from Chat Stasi.

That is also not how the First Amendment works :)

If a company is ordered to do something by a government, or they run something like a company town acting in lieu of the government, it becomes a state actor.

https://edri.org/our-work/european-citizens-demand-router-freedom/ What do you think of router freedom?

Precedents don't apply because it's not a government entity, someone says.

Well, I'd rather they didn't have any excuses to justify whatever it is they do. If they're going to arbitrarily and unilaterally do something, that is on them.

Patreon is a hate group.

https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2023/05/ftc-approves-final-order-requiring-mastercard-stop-blocking-use-competing-debit-payment-networks Federal Trade Commission votes 3-0 to put Mastercard Inc under a consent decree to force them to stop blocking the use of competing payment networks.

Ashcroft worked for that other guy who lied about there being weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, who didn't even win the election but got seated by the Supreme Court, who had war crimes happen under his watch, and who opened Guantanamo Bay.