Show newer
Olives boosted

If you’re a cybersecurity expert, researcher or represent an NGO, consider signing the open letter at eidas-open-letter.org/

#eidas #security

mullvad.net/en/blog/2023/11/2/

"Articles 45 and 45a stipulate that web browsers must recognise a new form of certificate issued by any EU state has , potentially compromising the encryption and most of all trust and overall security of the web."

Another disturbing proposal...

Mullvad VPN  
EU Digital Identity framework (eIDAS) another #chatcontrol? https://mullvad.net/blog/2023/11/2/eu-digital-identity-framework-eidas-another-kind-of...
Olives boosted

last-chance-for-eidas.org

"These changes radically expand the capability of EU governments to surveil their citizens by ensuring cryptographic keys under government control can be used to intercept encrypted web traffic across the EU. Any EU member state has the ability to designate cryptographic keys for distribution in web browsers and browsers are forbidden from revoking trust in these keys without government permission. "

Anyone who opposes should also be wary of which could be used to usher in mass surveillance.

While a company's moderation practices might be imperfect, it still doesn't help to put lots of pressure on them to "take more bad things down", when that is likely to lead to them also taking down legitimate content.

I suspect if there were mental health issues associated with social media, it would probably come in the form of bad news. Suppressing news would come with it's own issues though, and I don't think you'd want someone to be ignorant.

Hmm... Maybe, if the chained up bicycle is an obstacle to other people moving around (or it's abandoned for days or weeks), then it might make sense.

Show thread

The "standard features are scary" rhetoric probably comes from Kidron. The out of touch baroness.

She was appointed as a baroness by the British Conservative Party because she made a documentary where she was shrill and panicky about... Online porn.

I don't think she has any actual qualifications or expertise in anything. She appears to be a film maker?

Even on the more modest end, though it gets harsher, imagine the government running shrill fear campaigns about... Basically, the screen time moral panic.

Olives  
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20231023IPR08161/new-eu-rules-needed-to-make-digital-platforms-less-addictive "infinite scroll" F...

youtube.com/watch?v=shBwf97O7z Ironically, it wasn't that long ago when the Australian Government was like this.

Olives  
https://reclaimthenet.org/australias-authoritarian-misinformation-low-protection-self-incrimination "The very foundations of free speech in Austral...
Olives boosted

europarl.europa.eu/news/en/pre

"infinite scroll" Forums (i.e. the forum software, Discourse), fediverse implementations, chats like Discord, and more have infinite scrolling (a feature where you scroll down and it automatically fills in more content for you, though in the case of a chat, it fills it in as you scroll up). It's a standard feature on sites.

"likes" This is a common feature on sites. Discord has it in the form of emoji reactions. Forums have it (i.e. Reddit, for something much smaller, Discourse?). Social networks have it (including just about every fediverse implementation). I imagine it's prevalent because it's a useful way of giving feedback.

Read receipts are useful to know when someone has read a message?

With notifications, I see they specifically mention *push notifications*. A broader category would encompass any feature which pools events relating to you into one easy to check place (which would be dreadfully inconvenient / less functional). Still, it is more convenient. I think depending on how it's implemented, it might be sub-optimal in terms of privacy. This one is one you have to opt into to enable in web browsers.

Auto-play... It can be an annoying feature when you have five tabs with five videos and they all play at once over each other. Or when it automatically plays another video when you're done with one. The rhetoric here seems kind of panicky though.

"warnings or automatic locks after a pre-set time use (in particular for minors); total screen time summaries." Please don't imitate China.

"greyscale mode" What is this...?

Feels kind of moral panicky.

reclaimthenet.org/australias-a

"The very foundations of free speech in Australia are under threat, warn legal experts, as the country considers adopting a chilling law that aims to tackle online “misinformation.”"

"This development has stirred significant contention, as the bill seems to undermine the cherished “right to silence” principle, which shields Australians suspected of crimes.

Furthermore, the draft’s scope of what constitutes trigger-worthy content is alarmingly vast. It goes beyond just flagging hate speech, encompassing any content that could potentially jeopardize the health, economy, or even the democratic processes of Australia."

reason.com/2023/11/01/trick-or

"While parents believe it's crucial for elementary school kids to do things "away from direct adult supervision," there is "a sizable gap between parent attitudes and actions," the study found.

How sizable? Less than 25 percent of parents will let their kids, ages five to eight, prepare their own snacks. Only half the parents of kids ages nine to 11 were willing to let their children go fetch an item from another aisle at the store. The majority of those same parents were also unwilling to let them walk to a friend's home, or play in the park with one. Just 15 percent would let their kids trick or treat without adult supervision."

reason.com/2023/10/31/teenage-

"According to a recent NPR story, kids over 14 in Chesapeake, Virginia, caught trick-or-treating can be charged with a misdemeanor. Until 2019, they apparently faced six months in jail.

In nearby Norfolk, Suffolk, Portsmouth, and Virginia Beach, kids over 12 are barred from trick-or-treating. Rayne, Louisiana, and Jacksonville, Illinois, also ban teenage trick-or-treaters. In Belleville, Illinois, they can get slapped with a $1,000 fine."

eff.org/press/releases/eff-sup

"The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) urged the Supreme Court today to review and reverse a dangerous ruling allowing the Justice Department to censor X’s ability to publish information about government requests for the platform’s private user data, a decision that undermines at least a hundred years of First Amendment case law on when the government can bar private speech before it is published."

"The government has been fighting X, formerly known as Twitter, for nearly a decade to stop it from publishing a 2013 transparency report that would give its users a more complete picture of how many times the government—armed with orders from a secret court and the FBI—demanded customer information for national security surveillance."

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.