Show newer

There are also people who assume that a few tech companies are using the *same technology* as they did a decade ago and that they're not adopting even less accurate technologies.

Show thread

Around a decade ago, Microsoft opened up the whole can of worms of private mass surveillance. Retrospectively, it was probably a bad decision and it sold the idea of violating someone's right to privacy as a tool of convenience for chasing crime.

Then, we get takes like this, where someone reckons that the government spying on people is not surveillance at all.

Olives  
So, I saw a take like this earlier: "Scanning people's messages is not 'mass surveillance'." Uh, how is opening up everyone's messages and checkin...

So, I saw a take like this earlier:

"Scanning people's messages is not 'mass surveillance'."

Uh, how is opening up everyone's messages and checking to see if there're certain things in there not mass surveillance.

What. You mean there are sites which don't just immediately permanently ban people because of some stupid technicality. How shocking.

Olives  
When Discord pitches the concept of a "warning", something which has been done in content moderation for over thirty years, as if it is some new ra...

When Discord pitches the concept of a "warning", something which has been done in content moderation for over thirty years, as if it is some new radical thing to others.

eff.org/deeplinks/2024/06/poli
"Minnesotan law enforcement flew their drones without a warrant 4,326 times in 2023"

"This marks a large, 41 percent increase from 2022, when departments across the state used drones 3,076 times"

Olives boosted

“What we’re talking about is a kind of self-negating paradox. You cannot do mass surveillance privately, full stop.”

@Mer__edith telling it as it is when it comes to attempts to crush encryption with client-side scanning on private messaging apps.

#e2ee #encryption #privacy #surveillance #chatcontrol

theguardian.com/technology/art

wired.com/story/titan-submersi What's so remarkable about it is that the CEO didn't just cut corners and get people killed. He cut corners and got himself killed.

"The Exclusive Inside Story Is More Disturbing Than Anyone Imagined"
I don't think anything to do with this guy can surprise me at this point.

theguardian.com/technology/art
"Police have used the “very legitimate grievance” the public has with large tech companies like Meta about data collection and surveillance as a pretext to undermine user , the president of encrypted messaging app Signal has said."

Olives boosted

netzpolitik.org/2024/client-si
"The planned chat control makes the world less secure and more authoritarian, as it is directed against private and encrypted communication. Proponents are using disinformation, lies, and sleight of hand to push through the project. But can still be stopped. A commentary."

This is probably obvious at this point, but I also don't think is intended for what they claim it is. The police were pretty clear that what they wanted was a capability to investigate crime *in general*.

It also probably helps his AI stocks when he pitches "AI solutions" as solutions to society's problems.

Olives  
Ashton and a few others are a good example of how so-called white knights can be worse than useless in reality.

Ashton and a few others are a good example of how so-called white knights can be worse than useless in reality.

This is from another site, but someone pointed out that puritans make mundane and ordinary things out as if they're "obscene" or "indecent", even seeing sex where it isn't present. That sounds about right.

theguardian.com/world/article/
"’s senate has passed the final reading of a historic marriage equality bill, paving the way for the country to become the first in south-east Asia to recognise same-sex marriage.

The bill gained the support of nearly all upper-house lawmakers and will be sent to the palace for endorsement by King Maha Vajiralongkorn. The law will come into force 120 days after it is published in the royal gazette."

By not being as consistent in defending the freedom of expression, it probably makes it easier for these politicians to justify things like chat control.

Olives  
https://freiheitsrechte.org/en/themen/digitale-grundrechte/chatkontrolle "Chat control in the narrower sense is the part of the draft according to ...
Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.