Show newer

It's basically a way of saying "subhumans" without actually saying subhumans. That is what makes it awful. It also has a vibe of being archaic and old.

Show thread

Also, if someone isn't making the bare minimum effort to not use blatant and cartoonish dehumanizing language which looks like something which popped out from fifty years ago, then that kind of says something about them as a person.

Show thread

If someone uses the word "deviant", that is basically an immediate red flag.

The reason is that it shows that they habitually dehumanize people and that usually means that they are unlikely to have anything useful to say.

My profile appears to load if I click on my name on a post but not if I click on it in the sidebar.

Social media drama is something I don't particularly miss.

I shouldn't have to say this but when I say someone who is LGBT, I don't mean like an activist, I mean, someone with particular sexualities or other things. They don't have to be an activist. Maybe, they are. But, they don't have to be.

I'm saying this because I've gotten this take before (not on this site though) and it is missing the point.

Something that has characters who are LGBT doesn't have to be boring though. Maybe, there are developers from a large company who create dull entertainment.

If someone is just churning out sludge, then that is probably not going to save it, but it doesn't have to be boring. For instance, I think someone might miss how many titles might have something like that present.

Show thread

In essence, it's a variation on a social media issue where someone says something, that something gets probably taken out of context, someone assumes the worst, and it becomes a recipe for (further?) drama.

And then, there is a whole lot of yelling and people missing the point about what it is actually about.

Olives  
And yes, it does get pretty silly. Social media is like that (particularly that site).

And yes, it does get pretty silly. Social media is like that (particularly that site).

Show thread

It's a bit tricky because it's probably not that easy to tell what is going to take off (in a bad way) and what isn't. We have the benefit of hindsight but maybe they didn't.

Show thread

In regards to Godot, the account manager should not have picked a fight with a random person on social media (even if they find them annoying). By calling themselves "woke", it taps into a pre-existing idea that woke means someone who is politically correct, a stiff, and pedantic (this is how the term is seen among a number of people).

What they should have done was ignored someone's random take and said something like "hey, who has built a game with characters who are LGBT?". I don't think anyone would have batted an eye, if they did that. The way they handled the debacle was also quite unprofessional and only poured fuel on the flames.

Was that response to them warranted? Maybe not, social media isn't a nice place. That said, the account manager should have avoided getting involved in social media drama to begin with.

digitalcameraworld.com/news/fa
"Female photography charity Hundred Heroines has been banned by Facebook for ten years for 'breaking community guidelines' in a seeming mixup due to the word heroine being mistaken for illegal opioid heroin."

Looks like an electoral deepfake law in California has already been struck down as unconstitutional shortly after it was passed.

To reiterate, for the next update, I'm going to briefly cover human rights and will supplement the VR paragraph.

I don't know if there is anything else I might add.

Olives  
This time, I expanded on the "new technology" paragraph with examples of past panics, added information on the time around COVID-19 lockdowns, and ...

The tech policies the extremists came up with in the U.K. weren't even good for the economy.

I don't have a particular issue with nuclear power. I think it could be a way forward (at least in part) with how the politics around climate change can be, even if it isn't a perfect solution. Some countries are pursuing it.

Ideally, of course, we would have nuclear fusion power plants, although who knows how far off that might be.

I'm told that the term 2D refers to something fictional, rather than a particular style of such, although I've also seen a few Americans use it differently (where 3D might refer to a computer render in the style that someone might have in a Western video game, no, not talking about AI).

Anyway, I'm posting this to highlight a possible source of confusion.

If it's about the Internet though, a lot of the weird censorship which Australia might do might also be relevant. Like who would want to host something there?

Olives  
https://www.internetsociety.org/news/press-releases/2021/new-study-finds-australias-tola-law-poses-long-term-risks-to-australian-economy/ This is f...

A few 500s over the past few minutes.

Ironically, this post about 500s was hit by one when attempting to post it.

Another issue. If you try to unboost something, then boost it again, it doesn't allow that operation as it thinks it is still boosted.

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.