Show newer

"After all, social media providers are driven by profit. As I write this, X has relaxed its block policy"
I don't think X is representative of the typical company and I don't think this is a good representation of "profit based decisions". I suspect this is parroting talking points that someone else has provided.

I think they should have a working block function but this is reaching.

Show thread

"cases of bullying"
Generally speaking, it is one version of a social media platform that is available globally, so it is unlikely that any particular policy in any particular country has anything to do with that, much less the lack of the sorts previously mentioned.

Of course, there is a question as to what is being proposed?

Something which comes to mind is snooping on people's messages, which runs into privacy issues, issues of false positives, and the like, plus, it sounds unconstitutional. And it's questionable whether it would be effective.

Show thread

A year ago, "Child Fund Japan" deliberately misrepresented the results of a survey gauging attitudes towards online porn and presented that to their British colleagues.

Show thread

"Child Fund Japan" used to be called something like the "Christian Child Welfare Foundation". I've covered this before. Crucially, they're not known for making particularly nuanced or accurate takes.

Show thread

The "warning label" comment comes from *political rhetoric* in an environment where people are sick of one or two companies controlling large platforms.

It's scientifically dubious, broad brushed (that is to say it is silly to suggest it is having negative mental health effects on such a large scale), and contested by various scholars.

Show thread

Yes, sure, the Australian Prime Minister has said some stupid things *but he has been widely being condemned as being incompetent and opportunistic for doing so*.

Mindlessly copying that because an expat reading this might be interested in that is stupid.

Show thread

japantimes.co.jp/commentary/20 In the latest episode of "I have no clue what I'm talking about, let me just parrot what other people are saying".

Since someone brought up Haruhi, I remember the show was left open-ended. Haruhi was effectively a god-like being who alters reality without even realizing it.

But, instead of exploring this issue, or making progress on it, it's instead the hijinks of what happens if x or y happens. Even when it touch the issue, they only do so slightly or they tease you with the possibility that they might.

But how does a company actually make money from "AI".

Also, remember, when a Silicon Valley firm removes a post, it's probably not Jack Dorsey personally ordering someone to "remove that".

It's probably a third party firm contracted to do so which operates out of some country like Kenya

And I get it. Silicon Valley firms like this are a joke when it comes to transparency and they are prone to using confusing language.

Show thread

Unfortunately, this instance is bugging out, so if you see double posts or something, that would be why.

Could you please document puritanical Bluesky censorship in an article? How many people have been censored? Or how many do you know of? Are there patterns to it?

Maybe, a document to help track cases might help in producing such an article.

I don't like watching anime as it airs. I prefer to watch one episode after another after another when the season is over.

Practically speaking, the LDP is a very dominant party, so it's unsurprising it would involve them.

Show thread

As someone pointed out:
"In addition to standing against censorship of media, Yamada also focused on issues such as internet privacy and freedom of expression on the internet."

Show thread

sangiin.go.jp/japanese/joho1/k
Mr. YAMADA Taro Liberal Democratic Party

Current Responsibilities in the House of Councillors

Committee on General Affairs

Special Committee on Consumer Affairs

2012 first elected to the House of Councillors

2021 Parliamentary Vice-Minister for Digital Agency

2021 Parliamentary Vice-Minister of Cabinet Office

I wonder if science fiction / science fantasy writers realize that a galactic empire, or an inter-galactic empire, would have a lot more than "billions" or "trillions" of people.

Looking at one science fantasy, I wouldn't be surprised, if they had a scene like "For a low price, buy your own private planet" and someone buys the planet, builds a villa, and doesn't do anything else with it.

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.