Show newer

Think of the children shills: We want you to adopt this measure which will never stand up in court and which has already been ruled to be unlawful in previous cases. If you don't, you are a bad person.

One time when I saw "parental controls" in action, it was by very controlling anti-LGBT helicopter parents harassing their LGBT child.

I'm actually still in favor of just entirely scrapping chat control. It creates an authoritarian state apparatus (which still wouldn't make the problem go away). For truly malicious sites, it seems that efforts to take them down have been ramping up for years. It is also all too easy for the censorship to expand or for there to be collateral censorship.

On another note, it's interesting how the shills in favor of it are interested in *literally no middle ground*. They take on the most extreme positions and argue hard that it is the only correct position.

So-called "zero tolerance" positions are not necessarily good. Even web proxies seem to have been hit in 2022.

"What has the AfD done to stop chat control? To the contrary: the negotiator of your ID group has always spoken out strongly IN FAVOUR of the proposal."

I've seen one AfD in the E.U. Parliament speaking out in opposition to it in public but then that is one person. She is also very conspiratorial.

Also, I don't think someone needs the AfD to get someone with that position.

There is also already quite an unpleasant stigma around mental disabilities... I'm not really happy when someone brings them up as a scapegoat...

This is honestly horrifying, though it isn't surprising as DeSantis was also calling for drug smugglers to be shot and killed...

Simply locking more people up is not the answer to mental health... It also seems that it wouldn't have the benefits that he expects.

Olives  
https://reason.com/2023/10/30/desantis-wants-to-reduce-mass-shootings-by-locking-more-people-in-mental-hospitals/ "In the wake of a mass shooting i...

I feel like I'm trapped in Hell with how these stupid authoritarian ideas keep getting advanced...

It's annoying when someone only talks about "reducing risk", even as such attempts have negative impacts on fairly good people.

I've covered this a couple of times, but I never went into how creepy and opportunistic it was for IJM (International Justice Mission) to show up during . As you might expect from a religious group (accused of having a history of exaggerating rates of sex trafficking (1) and being anti sex work) trying to get a foot in the door, they tried to conflate legitimate content with abuse (2).

For instance, they wanted to treat things like "written text" as "child porn". In practice, this would mean censoring things like stories written by victims / survivors (preferred term varies), literature, roleplay, fantasy, and so on. It also appears to have therapeutic value.

They also pointed to a "terminology guideline", which seems to really be a puritanical propaganda doc (a hideously out of touch one) intended to encourage countries to adopt extreme and harmful definitions (i.e. child not meaning an actual real child), which would be harmful (3,4). It's one of the most sinister things I've seen.

1 engadget.com/2019-05-31-sex-li
2 ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-r
3 qoto.org/@olives/1110833026508
4 qoto.org/@olives/1111922961989

qoto.org/@olives/1113215127842 The new paper linking a lack of independent activity without monitoring / control to depression / suicidal ideation might be of interest to the crowd.

Olives boosted

washingtonpost.com/parenting/2

"For years, Peter Gray, a research professor of psychology and neuroscience at Boston College, has been closely following two disturbing trends: the dwindling of independent activity and play afforded to children over the past half-century, and the accelerating rise in mental health disorders and suicides among youth during that same period."

"There are familiar factors that surface in discussions of the youth mental health crisis in America, with screen use and social media often topping the list of concerns."

qoto.org/@olives/1113072159532
Gray actually mentioned in his paper that it had nothing to do with those, and put in a bunch of studies showing that. You have to read a fair bit in but it's there.

"But Gray suspects a deeper underlying issue: The landscape of childhood has transformed in ways that are profoundly affecting the way children develop — by limiting their ability to play independently, to roam beyond the supervision of adults, to learn from peers, and to build resilience and confidence."

reason.com/2023/10/30/desantis

"In the wake of a mass shooting in Lewiston, Maine, that killed 18 people, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis has called for more involuntary institutionalization."

"Yet involuntary institutionalization isn't likely to help either. Indeed, making it easier to toss people into mental institutions against their will raises even greater concerns for due process."

""A 2017 task force report on the involuntary referrals of children under Florida's Baker Act found that one-third of them were not necessary," according to a recent article by Kaitlin Gibbs of the University of Florida Levin College of Law. "Many children are Baker Acted more than once, which shows the initial Baker Act may not have successfully treated children with mental illness. At least thirty percent of all children Baker Acted will have a repeat Baker Act within five years.""

"Nor is throwing people into mental wards likely to reduce the number of mass shootings. As Ragy Girgis, a clinical psychiatrist at Columbia University, wrote in 2022, "Serious mental illness—specifically psychosis—is not a key factor in most mass shootings or other types of mass murder." And while 25 percent of mass shootings "are associated with non-psychotic psychiatric or neurological illnesses, including depression," he notes that "in most cases these conditions are incidental.""

"If DeSantis' plan were enacted, the likely result would be a rapid increase in the unnecessary institutionalization of mentally ill individuals—and a negligible impact on criminal violence. If taking people's guns is a violation of their rights, forcing them into a mental facility surely is too."

"volume" "frequency" Any measures would be very burdensome for a provider (and could even be used in a harassing manner on a flimsy basis).

Even more so when there are multiple layers of providers involved, as this can incur great technical obstacles.

That's sort of a guardrail, though not a perfect one.

Olives  
https://xnet.maadix.org/nextcloud/index.php/s/NZX7cxbQSETid6g Looking at this, I have a few points (though, I'm not entirely sure how it'd work out...

It looks like the usual authoritarians who want to control the Internet are now hiring minors to say good things about their ideology... Ugh.

theguardian.com/australia-news

"Hundreds of millions of identity checks under the federal government’s ID verification service may have been illegally conducted, with the Albanese government rushing through legislation to underpin the service.

Identity verification services are used by government departments and businesses – such as credit card providers and power companies – to combat fraud and identity theft.

Legislation to allow the identity verification service was abandoned by the former Morrison government in 2019 after the parliamentary joint committee on intelligence and security recommended it be redrafted over concerns there were insufficient privacy safeguards for the proposal.

However, the service began operating and, four years on, the Albanese government has pushed through new legislation in the House of Representatives. It is now under review in the Senate."

theintercept.com/2023/10/28/in This is kind of inevitable when someone is just demanding platforms to "do more".

stopfinancialsurveillance.org/

"Two years after the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) passed amidst backlash from the public, the US Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) are proposing regulation for its implementation that would mandate mass surveillance of digital assets. This is likely unconstitutional and would be a massive blow to human rights.

We have until November 14 to speak out on the danger of this proposed rule."

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.