Show newer
Olives boosted

So far, the Threads Borg has yet to come for the United Federation of Planets.

Temperature increases with the apparent partial arrival of Threads.

I imagine my quote is complete with my typo where I didn't spell per se properly. Good times with past me.

I think the British Government did that but literally everyone ignored them when they did.

Show thread

It's interesting how one censorship advocate has created a "youth council", just so they can justify their own censorship by pointing to a minor who they got to nod along with them.

I think though that some of these bad faith actors are getting desperate though (which means that pro human rights / pro privacy campaigns are working), if one has to bust out the QAnon-like dog-whistles.

theguardian.com/australia-news I feel like statements like this exaggerate how much power she actually has (Proton is a *Swiss* company), but it is important to pushback against her.

Useful to consider that the original post references an article where someone literally just ignored the criminality outside of a cursory mention (which there seemed to be little of) and complained about something else.

And it was very distracting as you're literally there to read about the criminality, not someone's QAnon-like rant.

I don't think I've seen takes like that, that bad, in quite some time though. This one is less bad but clearly a dog-whistle, and it's worth watching out for that.

Show thread

Supposed to take someone seriously who is like tripping QAnon flag after QAnon flag... Including the trans prisoners one.

Show thread

So, saw it again, this time from a QAnon-adjacent data broker adjacent "think of the children" advocate. One of the people pushing for things like the chat control.

Show thread

I have like every base covered...

Olives  
"they have a sexual interest in children" I'm noticing a strange emphasis on this in a couple of articles. It's really strange to specifically make...
Olives boosted

"they have a sexual interest in children" I'm noticing a strange emphasis on this in a couple of articles.

It's really strange to specifically make a point out of it, especially when it overshadows what crime it is someone is actually carrying out.

Is this some new Q dog-whistle...?

From a psychological standpoint, it is also not that which is the problem per say... And I think it just makes people paranoid...

It's also just plain distracting...

npr.org/2023/12/14/1219460589/

"A grand jury in Mississippi determined that there was no criminal conduct on behalf of the officer who shot and wounded an 11-year-old boy in his home who had called authorities for help."

OW

Uncle Duke  
“Okay, who am I?” “Dracula!” “Nope.” “Batman?” “That’d be too on the nose, no?” “Fine then, I give up.” “Michael Jackson, you idiot.”
Olives boosted
Olives boosted

“Where do you think you’re going?”
“I can’t do this anymore, I quit.”
“But-“
“Later, losers.”

Olives boosted

decades-long manhunt ends, finally bringing closure to grandson of trampling victim

Olives boosted

“Okay, who am I?”
“Dracula!”
“Nope.”
“Batman?”
“That’d be too on the nose, no?”
“Fine then, I give up.”
“Michael Jackson, you idiot.”

Olives boosted

There must be another Gerald Nathan Yves Ulysses Thomas Gary Frederick Edward Zachary Ronald Xavier Charles Bartholomew Nicholas Kevin Octavius Kendall Jonathan Henry Ezekiel Carter Timothy Vladimir David Brian Yakov Finley Underwood.

Olives boosted
Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.