https://events.ccc.de/congress/2023/hub/en/event/who-killed-the-internet-and-a-promising-alternative-for-public-communication-and-social-media-the-fediverse/ Apparently, they're going to be talking about the fediverse at a conference. Dunno if it's good.
I think you can get some mileage out of it, but it's annoying when someone tries to dismiss valid concerns there by going, "Oh you can just run your own site."
It's a very obvious consequence of "censor more! censor more! censor more! why is this here?!".
I remember that Busou Renkin (武装錬金, Arms Alchemy is one translation which people gave it) had a Victor. It also had that weird butterfly guy, lol. It's an interesting #anime to watch.
https://arstechnica.com/ai/2023/12/ai-created-virtual-influencers-are-stealing-business-from-humans/ As someone pointed out, some of this probably has something to do with the whole "brand safety" thing.
I don't really have an opinion on it though, I don't really see much how it matters. It's kind of seen as a "get lucky and make money" area.
https://ecnl.org/news/give-smile-get-smile-human-rights-impacts-emotion-recognition-workplace "For example, neurodivergent, LGBTQI+, and people speaking with accents or dialects might be discriminated against by voice recognition or other emotion recognition technologies."
This one is from early 2023. ECNL and other civil society groups opposed AI surveillance cameras at the 2024 Olympic and Paralympic games.
@mima This "tooters" site honestly gives me the creeps. The sort of language they use is reminiscent of some very weird circles, not really how a normal person speaks.
The dive is a work I have a bit of pride in. It's a "I wasn't born yesterday" type message for people who kept trying to use clever language, and ducking and weaving, and conflating brazenly right before our eyes. It's snappy, but it is also the only correct response to these sorts of "games".
Why do we let these people get away with this?
https://www.thefire.org/news/victory-after-fire-lawsuit-court-halts-new-yorks-misguided-law-targeting-online-speech Here's a piece on the previous New York law which was ruled unconstitutional.
Well, the problem with it is that it's geared towards chilling some form of speech that the State doesn't approve of, and that isn't consistent with the First Amendment.
Whatever someone thinks of those things, it is nonetheless speech protected by the First Amendment. So, that is kind of worrying.
Software Engineer. Psy / Tech / Sex Science Enthusiast. Controversial?
Free Expression. Human rights / Civil Liberties. Anime. Liberal.