Show newer

eff.org/deeplinks/2023/12/taki

This is certainly interesting (I see the EFF has been busy this year), but before risking interacting with people with exceptionally poor takes (probably not from the EFF, mind you), I invite @eff to read the following "articles" (can something be called an article on this platform?) which I wrote (one pertaining to how porn isn't some spooky thing, but also, one about people who almost pathologically* can't stop trying to conflate content containing fictional scenarios / people, with abuse, also engaging in rounds of concern trolling, which is honestly a form of implicit conflation):

qoto.org/@olives/1115160112466 Porn isn't spooky

qoto.org/@olives/1111915432366 Conflation. This doesn't go into any specific conflation but it does go into general patterns of conflation.

Curiously, one of the people I cite here actually used to work for the EFF (as recently as 2018, it seems). Not that I allow him to carry this piece. It's based on a number of observations from a number of people, quite a few locations, what the vast majority of content seems to look like, and *not* trying to project a censorial agenda.

* Metaphor.

One will also attempt to lie to someone's face about apparent "abuse", and trying to depict a general purpose service as being "negligent", then it will turn out it is a photo indistinguishable from legitimate (and even non-sexual) conduct. The sort of (probable very rare) scenario which exists as more of an attempted "gotcha" than a legitimate threat.

Unfortunately, stretching terms (and also methodologies which don't involve actually examining content) seem to be becoming more common.

This is probably just a drop in the bucket of shenanigans. In any case, while moderation is probably important, it doesn't mean there aren't problematic grifters out there trying to make a name out of "dirt".

eff.org/deeplinks/2023/12/digi I was going to comment on this but I ended up writing something quite foul about these African countries, so I'm instead going to just post a link.

Robotics; Notes was an unusual but interesting anime, apparently based on a visual novel (quite a few of them are).

I think it was made by the people who came up with Steins Gate, and that other one, Chaos Head.

If there's an Electronic Frontier Foundation, is there also an Analogue Frontier Foundation? Lol.

Then again, maybe there should be an Analogue Frontier Foundation with the sort of civil rights violations that happen in the offline world...

Are there any or related subjects which you'd like me to cover?

Are there any interesting bits of sex science, or civil liberties causes, or technology related things which you'd like me to cover?

veilid.com/ Serious question. Why would someone have this ultra privacy project but then have like just a Discord (which isn't exactly great for privacy)?

The ironic thing is that the copyright expiring will probably give it far more publicity than it would get rusting away in Disney's vault, lol.

your auntifa liza 🇵🇷 🦛 🦦  
and here it is, laddies and germs: STEAMBOAT WILLIE #PublicDomainDay #Disney
Olives boosted

Older localizations in particular can feel very "Ahem, you do realize there are other countries than just America?"

Show thread

web.archive.org/web/2023091813 By the way, Kadokawa were at the U.N. complaining about piracy, lol.

Ironically, it's probably piracy which aided in marketing and breaking up really localized adaptations which were hard to differentiate from American content (why they were so scared of exposing people to other cultures is really beyond me, the most infamous example was editing out Japanese food items in Pokemon...). Also, the silly "cartoons are for kids" cliché.

Olives boosted

Ultimately the fight for privacy, security, and thus freedom of expression and association will be won't be won in a courtroom or a legislature.

It will be won my people making a choice that those values are worth actively protecting.

Every time someone localizes cwtch for a new language, or submits an anonymous bug report, or simply reaches out over ephemeral wires to say hi, I remember why we continue to do this work.

Show thread

I was literally just thinking of @sarahjamielewis then moments later she appeared :o

Sarah Jamie Lewis  
2023 was somewhat of a Red Queen's Race for #privacy, #p2p, #decentralization At the end of it I feel like we had to run much faster just to stay ...
Olives boosted

2023 was somewhat of a Red Queen's Race for #privacy, #p2p, #decentralization

At the end of it I feel like we had to run much faster just to stay in the same place.

Much like the rest of the space, funding for @openprivacy and @cwtch took a hit, and we have to continue to squeeze ever more out of the amazing support we do get.

When I look at where Cwtch is now compared to a few years ago I couldn't be prouder.

So much more to do, so many better worlds to build.

privacyinternational.org/advoc

No, not Stop Gitlab, Stop Gilab. GILAB. It's an overly broad South African "national security" bill.

eff.org/deeplinks/2022/12/no-n This one is from 2022. British activist tears into the censorship of naked yoga (strangely specific cause to pick up, but yeah, censorship is bad).

Olives boosted

Since I also saw someone coming up with a spooky story (of how censorship can be a terrible thing), I thought I'd add one of my mine.

I encountered a pretty spooky and creepy coincidence once. So, there were discussions of censorship (and something about legality in some very random backwater country) involving "fictional minors", then, shortly afterwards (I'd say within a few weeks or so), someone (who was there and wasn't keen on censorship) turned up dead. Suicide. In that very country. Very eerie.

Anyway, I don't think we particularly need stories of self-harm or suicide to get to the, rather evident, point that Censorship Of Artistic Expression Is A Bad Thing.

In any case, with things like suicide, it can feel very surreal. Someone is talking normally one day (well, actually week in this case, but you get the saying), like any ordinary person. Then, they are no longer there. So, I guess be good to one another, yes, yes.

Olives  
Some points about censoring fictional content there (censorship is a bad idea): 1) It might fuel someone's persecution complex. The idea of a dange...
Olives boosted

I suppose with the LLM, someone can finally get their cute loli wife, huh? Lol.

Olives boosted
Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.