https://reclaimthenet.org/italy-popular-social-media-accounts-to-be-treated-as-publishers
"In what can be seen as an open clampdown against the freedoms and rights of social media influencers, the Italian Regulatory Authority of Telecommunications (AGCOM) has announced that people with a following exceeding 1,000,000 will now be legally considered as “producers of audio-visual content” within the law, placing them on the same legal footing as publishers."
I suspect this language will cause a certain amount of confusion as to what a "publisher" is.
"Under the new regulations, influencers are compelled to clearly distinguish sponsored content and ads, with penalties reaching up to a quarter-million euros for non-compliance. Violations concerning child protection could warrant penalties exceeding half a million euros. Even non-commercial content produced by influencers must adhere to anti-discrimination regulations and uphold various standards currently imposed on traditional media creators, such as abstention from disseminating “misinformation,” “hate speech,” or promotion of “harmful” behavior like excessive alcohol consumption."
Sounds troublesome for free expression.
This is the sort of nonsense that grandstanding gets you.
https://themessenger.com/news/florida-school-district-dictionaries-escambia-county-sex-ed
"A school district in Florida has taken dictionaries off its libraries' shelves because of fears they violate the state's recent legislation on books depicting or describing sexual conduct."
I don't know whether to laugh at this because of the sheer absurdity of it or complain about it. Both?
"Last week, in response to a Freedom of Information Act request by Houston lawyer Matthew Zorn, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) revealed the rationale for its August 2023 recommendation that the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) move marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III of the Controlled Substances Act."
Also, while it's easy to understand why they might be frustrated with the other party leading them on, then screwing them over at the last minute at the referendum, I suspect that other party would just go on about how they're victims of some totalitarian regime, if she did this.
https://reclaimthenet.org/michelle-rowland-tries-to-justify-new-censorship-law Misinformation is a very vague and nebulous term.
https://reclaimthenet.org/the-tsa-plans-big-digital-id-push-in-2024
"The US’s leading transportation security organization, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), is taking significant steps towards a more digital future. And, of course, that means more surveillance and tracking."
"In a four-part action plan released by the TSA, the agency plans to extend its mobile driver’s license initiative and more widely utilize facial recognition technology in airports. This includes up-scaling their current pilot program testing digital identities and mobile licenses — used at TSA checkpoints — to at least nine states. It follows a previous announcement in May that disclosed the TSA’s examination of the potential for digital license and ID implementations across 25 domestic airports."
"Parallel with these digital ID efforts, the TSA also commits to amplifying the utilization of facial identification systems under their PreCheck service, a program aimed at preemptively assessing threats and facilitating a quicker airport security process for enrolled travelers. The service is somewhat controversial as it allows the agency deeper access into data and information about an individual and their lives – some of which go beyond what travelers believe they have access to."
https://reclaimthenet.org/how-a-typo-in-a-geofence-warrant-further-endangered-privacy
"Namely, a “suspected typo” in a geofencing warrant is to blame for extending surveillance of everybody and their phone in a given physical location from a supposedly restricted one – to in one instance “two miles over San Francisco,” reports say.
That would include businesses, private homes, and places of worship.
The incident highlights the problems related to this legal/law enforcement tactic, and its implementation, and reminds those willing to listen why it is wrong to begin with – warrant order typos or not."
"It turns the rule of “innocent until proven guilty” on its head, and is therefore, as critics concerned with civil liberties insist, clearly unconstitutional."
https://nichegamer.com/prison-architect-2-announced/ Eh, 3D? I liked the 2D style of the game. Well, I suppose you might be able to do some interesting things in 3D.
I've never really been a fan of the way that platforms really push for collecting phone numbers.
https://lifehacker.com/twitter-used-your-phone-number-to-send-you-ads-now-wha-1838906777 A possible reason why they do so is for marketing, of course (also, security is not the only reason they might use to push someone to give them their phone number...).
I don't think Twitter in particular was even that aggressive about it prior to 2018. #privacy
You might remember that I dug back to something like 2009, and even back then, I could catch sight of him farting in the direction of the First Amendment.
While these platforms might be slightly more convenient, at first, they often get obsoleted by newer platforms, or they get weird, or have odd ideas of what content they don't like, and then there is the inevitable process of dragging an audience to another site, and changing a bunch of things.
A proper #blog would give someone so much more control and it would pay off in the long run when something inevitably crops up.
Another British #ECHR case. Have they considered the possibility that such incidences occur due to the existence of a black market here...? That if cannabis was legal, this wouldn't happen?
Software Engineer. Psy / Tech / Sex Science Enthusiast. Controversial?
Free Expression. Human rights / Civil Liberties. Anime. Liberal.