Of course, there are those who think otherwise, what can be done is to try to push for reps who are more in favor of liberty where ever possible in Europe.
Looks like it isn't a new power, but still, using a tragedy to use powers to bypass any sort of warrant requirement is still troublesome.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/apr/16/house-fisa-government-surveillance-senate
"The US House of Representatives agreed to reauthorize a controversial spying law known as Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act last Friday without any meaningful reforms, dashing hopes that Congress might finally put a stop to intelligence agencies’ warrantless surveillance of Americans’ emails, text messages and phone calls.
The vote not only reauthorized the act, though; it also vastly expanded the surveillance law enforcement can conduct. In a move that Senator Ron Wyden condemned as “terrifying”, the House also doubled down on a surveillance authority that has been used against American protesters, journalists and political donors in a chilling assault on #FreeSpeech."
#privacy #FourthAmendment
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2024/apr/16/us-provides-assurances-to-prevent-assange-appeal-against-extradition So many loopholes in these "assurances", and they might try to wash their hands of it, by saying that it was the DoJ which did it, not them.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/apr/17/ursula-von-der-leyen-scandal-european-commission-election Censor Ursula might be in trouble. ...Maybe.
Alexandra out there with an "AI" panic piece, even though we should have moved past these... So, she takes vague statistics, which likely contain false positives (even if they weren't, the numbers are actually fairly small), as a "sign" that the end is here and we have to "save the children". She also appears to conflate pure prompting which is not necessarily done with malicious intent with acting maliciously.
I think the main problem is that she looks at it through the lens of censorship. There is nothing which precludes someone being arrested for sexual harassment or other similar such anti-social behavior towards others.
If it's about privacy, something like APRA might be a more fruitful path forward than censorship (which tends to be harmful).
In a way, the politician claiming an expanded Section 702 is not Stasi-like is right. It is much worse than the Stasi. #privacy
https://act.demandprogress.org/call/no-on-section-702-call-page/
"Call your Senators right now and urge them to block the "Everyone is a spy" provision in the surveillance bill that just passed the House."
#privacy
There are quite a number of other unjust (or disproportionate) laws someone could push too but that is the classic example.
The point is that locking people up is a form of violence.
Consider that the next time someone suggests putting people in prison for drug possession.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-04-12/inquiry-supports-sex-work-decriminalisation-push-queensland/103697104
"A Queensland parliamentary inquiry has supported new laws to decriminalise sex work. "
"University of Queensland researcher Rachel Brennan said decriminalisation would improve health and safety outcomes for sex workers.
"There's a strong evidence base that supports decriminalisation as the best public health framework for sex workers and for communities," Ms Brennan said."
#auspol #HumanRights
https://reason.com/2024/04/16/the-feds-will-close-a-notorious-california-prison-where-guards-abused-women-with-impunity/
"The Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) announced Monday that it will close a federal women's prison in California where sexual abuse was so common that it was known as the "rape club."
The Associated Press first reported that the BOP is closing Federal Correctional Institution (FCI) Dublin, a low-security women's prison in California's Bay Area, after several years of failed efforts to root out systemic misconduct and abuse."
#HumanRights
Something Dr. Harper fails to acknowledge (perhaps, he hasn't noticed it?) is that one sample of his is recruited from a community which appears to be marketed primarily to criminals, particularly, abusers.
Despite this being the case (and quite relevant), this is not noted anywhere, and it is merely described as a "help seeking community".
This might lead to someone erroneously concluding that the nature of it is merely "clinical" or a "mental health circle", and it might lead someone to presume that there are more criminals than there really are (or other negative implications).
Loli vampire anime, lol.
For me, "#AI" art, while perhaps having a certain degree of novelty value, isn't as interesting as something a human might make.
For each piece of "AI" art, I probably look at 1000x more pieces of human art, and it has nothing to do with politics of whether "AI" is evil.
Software Engineer. Psy / Tech / Sex Science Enthusiast. Controversial?
Free Expression. Human rights / Civil Liberties. Anime. Liberal.