For an idea of the sort of inappropriate flags they have embraced over the years, one is homosexual activity. There have been others too but this is the most glaring one.
One of the reasons I use Dr. Lehmiller's study is that it is a general study on sexuality, and looks at, basically, normal people (the general population), not an ultra narrow assessment of a handful of criminals carried out by a criminologist (also, let's face it, their job is to look at people through the lens of being "potential criminals") who might get too hung up on superficial patterns.
For the next update, I'm not planning on changing any underlying points, it is going to be more of a supplement.
One thing I'm thinking on commenting on is Covid (although, sometimes there is a better way to bring up a particular point, so that plan might change).
Well, they tended to fund various weird faith-based therapies and things without him being personally slotted into a position.
Rather curiously, he even appointed himself as the minister of science, and there were indeed bad science takes at that time, although maybe it's a coincidence.
If you don't know how shadow cabinets work, maybe you are American, there is the Prime Minister who leads up the government, then there are various "ministers" who are appointed (from elected politicians) to run particular areas.
The opposition (the largest party other than the one in power) creates their own "cabinet", a shadow cabinet, basically, with people who sit there criticizing the government.
Also, going by commentary on it, Mozilla seemed to run their fedi instance really badly, so is one less badly run instance that much of a loss?
That aside though, launching new projects, wasting time on them, only to shutter them later, is something which Mozilla seems to do a lot.
I don't use these particular surveys though for a number of reasons, including relevance.
Software Engineer. Psy / Tech / Sex Science Enthusiast. Controversial?
Free Expression. Human rights / Civil Liberties. Anime. Liberal.