I'll keep my other thread in more general terms though, because I'd like to avoid making assumptions on specifics here.
Even innocuous language, that is written without regard for practical implementation could be over-read.
Not that long ago, we were being told that everything in Taiwan was going great. Meanwhile, the legislature is breaking out into a brawl over a few controversial bills.
https://focustaiwan.tw/politics/202412200006 Meanwhile in Taiwan.
I'm seeing a strange Bluesky conspiracy as to why a platform might adhere too much to Tanner.
In Facebook's case, it actually turned out to be a matter of convenience, rather than it being some hard legal standard, and they even admitted it wasn't a great tool. What they tried to go for was a uniform standard.
It also wasn't used for removing content, it was used for reporting it.
This came to mind because I saw a few allegations of Q like behavior from the Bluesky team (in November) the other day.
Considering the sorts of things that are being adapted, I wouldn't be surprised if something like that got adapted too.
Software Engineer. Psy / Tech / Sex Science Enthusiast. Controversial?
Free Expression. Human rights / Civil Liberties. Anime. Liberal.