Hi Everyone, the latest version of #logseq Times is up:
https://logseqtimes.com/logseq-times-2023-04-29-logseqai/
A look at the latest Logseq news, updates and thoughts during the past week.
- Logseq 0.9.4
- Logseq AI (OpenAI / ChatGPT)
- Sync
- Supertags
- Corporate Usage
- more
Thanks in advance as ever
First of all, thank you for the summary.
About this part:
> I think this needs a bit of communication from the Team to confirm their intentions and stem any potential misinformation spreading.
I thought the team had a problem with communication in general so I didn't care much in the past but my complain about OpenAI integration has another point that is not really about communication:
They are not respecting the Feature Requests section on the forum **at all**. The request for OpenAI integration has been made recently and it is mentioned in this summary.
There are tons of requests that better fit Logseq core features. Some are hard to implement, some less, but they are more than one year old and with many votes.
For me this is not about communication, this is just taking the money and implement what they want.
@post
On the also point, I cannot comment - I think you would be better off emailing / chatting with the team / Tienson directly as that may alleviate some / all your concerns. Or may cement your thinking
Apparently my complaints lead this announcement:
https://discuss.logseq.com/t/why-logseq-ai-and-how-to-preserve-privacy
They are developing local "AI" features and they said they are focusing on that, but they just published the code of OpenAI integration on feat/ai-lab branch atm. #logseq
@post Thanks a lot for the comment and the insight.
I understand where you are coming from but I am also sure thee Logseq team has their own thinking and idea of how best to improve te app - which to me comes does to communication. Share the insights and you can understand the thought process and you can get people on board or get their opinions and thoughts.