Thanks to everyone that voted:
https://qoto.org/@post/110207911042352184
Now #Logseq is even going to have ChatGPT in the sidebar and conversation saved in /chats in your graph folder.
Logseq has made a fool of us privacy-conscious people.
I will no longer support it financially and I won't recommend it anymore.
If someone will maintain a patched version that is fully FOSS and without built-in OpenAI services (kinda like Bromite with Chrome) on both FlatHub and F-droid repos can have 5$/month from me and hopefully from other privacy-conscious #PKM enthusiasts.
@post A bit surprising. Don't developers involve forum moderators in their schedule at all with regards to community participation and desired features?
Yes but they are totally ignoring the feedback, here there are the details:
I'm not sure if you are replying to me but just in case when I said "they ignore feedback" I was of course not referring to posts here but to the Feature Requests category that they setup with votes.
@post I already had read that post, Alex. But question was more specific: Neglecting random dudes on the internet is a different thing from ignoring mediation staff actively trying to communicate features, in case developers don't have time to look at the voting system. They really should work on their communication, if neither gets attention.