After much reflection, I have decided not to change much about my approach to my upper-level 19thC fiction course. Yes, I'm concerned about AI, and I will be explicit about why I don't want students to use it (and be alert for signs that they have). But my goals for the course are (IMHO of course) well served by my pedagogy, developed over nearly 30 years.

My intro class is another matter, though I'm still puzzling out how to manage the logistics of the increased hands-on in-class writing I'd like to incorporate.

What about other profs in humanities disciplines: how "disruptive" do you think you'll let AI be for you?

#highered

@RohanMaitzen I haven’t started teaching yet, but my idea is, at least for some assignments, to require students to turn in both their own work and ChatGPT’s (or some other generative AI’s) take on the assignment. I figure it’s little to no additional effort on their part and it provides a chance for both me and them to differentiate their writing from spicy autocomplete.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.