Last night @pfrazee.com joined @bcantrill, me, and the Oxide Friends to talk about the inner workings of @bsky.app and the AT Protocol. From Scuttlebutt to Firehose and the ill-fated Scenes, lots of inside baseball!
@grimalkina your mention of bio-focused reminds me that my current podcast crossover wish / fantasy is Change, Technically + Everything Hertz. James Heathers works in biosignals, just sayin' 🙏😇
@spoltier I know this one!! We currently have a focus on non-male guests for the pod right now in service of amplifying those voices and sharing our platform in that way ❤️ but thank you v much for the suggestion (and kind support)!
- I've always had this bent, but committing much more strongly to a curiosity about "states" over "traits." How do we reason in a state of fear? State of ambiguity? State of uncertainty? Ideas about how we coordinate differently, and what becomes foregrounded
- I've come back to enjoying a lot more bio-focused work this year, probably because of doing Change, Technically ! So much scicomm is needed here to help folks understand the new sciences of these types of measures
And that's it! After 37 installments I think I covered pretty much all the bigger things in the NEWS file with a story.
Of course, there's a lot more in this release. For the full list, consult our NEWS file:
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/70bae7648f2c18010187c9cf20093155eaa26029/NEWS
Stay tuned so that you won't miss out on the #systemd258 series when the time comes for the next release!
Wrote up some notes on Microsoft's new Phi-4 LLM. They trained it on a LOT of synthetic data, and the details of how and why they did that are really interesting.
https://simonwillison.net/2024/Dec/15/phi-4-technical-report/
On GAIA-X, through a Swiss lens. With some quotes by me. https://dnip.ch/2024/12/16/gaia-x-letzte-chance-fuer-europas-digitale-souveraenitaet-und-wie-die-schweiz-profitieren-koennte-teil-1/
I truly do not want to hear from European conservatives about the need for speed governors, location tracking, and neutralizing the revolutionary capacity of ebikes because it's scary when they go fast. Please hesitate to say that ebikes are a mixed blessing because they simply aren't. Of course the materials have a colonial origin, but the lithium needed to produce an ebike is an unimaginably small fraction compared to an electric car. Of course electricity is still in many places nonrenewable, but the electricity needed to power an ebike is many orders of magnitude less than an electric car. The alternatives are bad while ebikes are good, and any attempt to neutralize that goodness in service of protecting a car-centric society is regressive, conservative politics.
Read your bike history. Bikes have been a radical technology everywhere they exist. From a materialist perspective, you dont just invent the most energy efficient means of conveyance by an order of magnitude and have it not be revolutionary. You dont invent a technology that dramatically reshapes people's relationship with space and have that not be revolutionary.
Ebikes are an evolutionary step in that history. To be able to gain access to the City with a stolen BMX bike and the cost of a single Uber ride in parts is revolutionary. To not need government identification and an elaborate system of regulation to interact with space is, for now, revolutionary. To be able to avoid automated plate readers and move freely in a surveillance state is not a luxury, it is necessary.
"Aristocratic contempt for the lower orders is nothing new—just ask the Greek and Roman authors. Throughout history, this impulse has not just been cruel, but petty and irrational. Elites will often undermine their own position and tear apart the fabric of the state to lash out at others. To not just dominate but humiliate them. America has now achieved such broad prosperity that this aristocratic brain rot is infecting, or at least within reach, of huge swathes of the voting electorate."
https://www.liberalcurrents.com/a-disease-of-affluence/
Via Nils Gilman on eggs dot com, but he's now at @nilsgilman.bsky.social
Here lies tpolecat, slain by his printer card. There seems to be a subtle but serious problem with the card I designed because I took it out and my disk failures went away, then put it back and my disk failed almost immediately. Seriously no idea how this could be possible but I'm bummed about it and also lost a couple days of work. 10/31
On Monday, @bcantrill and I were joined by @postwait, KellyAnn Fitzpatrick, and @sogrady to talk about tech conferences. Unsurprisingly, a lot has changed in the decades since we met these folks at conferences! What's worth the trip in 2025? https://youtu.be/YBId0FLKxCo
In our study for instance we found that by troubling the definition of "adoption" we learned a lot: people can feel that their TEAM uses AI but they don't, and people can also be covertly using AI without their team knowing, btw there are already interesting gender diffs here, and people can be using AI but not trusting its output vs using AI and trusting it deeply; all of this is to say when you do designed social science you get to think about how to construct the measure & we really need that
code / data wrangler in Switzerland.
Compulsive reply guy. Posts random photos once in a while.