@larsweisbrod
Sollte ich vielleicht mal lesen …
Bin aber noch nicht über den Anfang hinausgekommen:
<TMIAHM>
"Jokes?" he asked.
"Let's hear one."
"Why is a laser beam like a goldfish?"
Mike knew about lasers but where would he have seen goldfish? Oh,
he had undoubtedly seen flicks of them and, were I foolish enough to ask,
could spew forth thousands of words. "I give up."
His lights rippled. "Because neither one can whistle."
</TMIAHM>
Bisher erinnert's mich an TOORCON 13
[https://web.archive.org/web/20111027164228/http://sandiego.toorcon.org/]
-Humor:
SHARKS WITH &^%$#@ING LASER BEAMS!
https://youtu.be/INFavIUmhcE?si=BTVzsn9R9SroWllB
Zum Humorverständis-Vergleich meine erste Frage an ChatGPT3
(hat Natascha Strobl verstanden, fand den Witz aber gar nicht lustig):
Butler vs. Bannon
If Judith Butler didn't exist, Steve Bannon would have had to invent her. Explain why.
ChatGPT:
This statement is a reference to Judith Butler, a prominent philosopher and gender theorist, and Steve Bannon, a political strategist and former advisor to Donald Trump. The statement suggests that Bannon, who is known for his far-right political views, would have created Butler if she didn't already exist, in order to serve as a target for his political attacks.
Bannon has a history of targeting left-leaning intellectuals and academics as part of his political strategy, and Judith Butler is one of his most frequent targets. Butler's work, which includes critiques of gender norms and the construction of identity, has been used by Bannon and others on the right as an example of supposed "cultural Marxism" and a threat to traditional values and institutions.
In other words, the statement suggests that Butler's work has become a convenient target for Bannon and other right-wing figures, who use it to rally their base and demonize their opponents. If Butler did not exist, Bannon would have had to create someone like her in order to continue this narrative and maintain his political power.
