coniferous lurker @taxuswc@qoto.org

@dlmk @Evv1L @frssoft @ajsilu@lamp.leemoon.network @pasha @PseudoCube сейчас я напишу это сообщение со всех своих аккаунтов

@taxuswc@shitpost.poridge.club @ZySoua @PseudoCube @frssoft @taxuswc@blob.cat @taxuswc@fe.disroot.org @9800@mastodon.ml мне тоже влом

@timur @ajsilu@ilyamikcoder.com а также известное волшебное "ой, забыл, (т.е., да, я прекрасно помнил о вашей просьбе все эти три недели, но не смог собраться это сделать, хотя работы на полчаса)"

@timur @ajsilu@ilyamikcoder.com /F

@nightfast @rf особенно если там можно перемотать время в 2013ый

@seeg @roptat (sorry for replying into a very old thread) my experience with asking chatgpt some simple astrophysics questions was the same: it can provide common responses to basic questions (i.e. why the sky is dark at night?), but they are often quite inaccurate. When I asked it to explain Olbers paradox (which is, basically, why the sky is dark if surface brightness does not depend on the distance) to me, it did so eagerly, however, it was unable to make a connection between its own responses and being asked "so, why the sky is dark, then?” replied with the same inaccurate answer as it did at step 1.

High school kids whom I explained this topic were typically able to see the point, so, basically, human intelligence still wins over some overtrained ai :)

basically, me: the day, absolutely wasted. time for a new alt then?

@vftdan I can see the formula rendered, but apparently that's one of qoto's custom extensions

@frssoft мда, спалился моментально..