referring to equations (10.5), (10.6) in the resource notes for Higgs decay into a fermion anti-fermion pair
lectures.lapth.cnrs.fr/standar

take note that (17.3), which is the absolute square of my probability amplitude, doesn't have a factor 2 because i haven't taken into account yet the other spin states of the fermion and anti-fermion in the decay process and you may refer to (10.5) in the resource material i have shared in the earlier toot and you may also notice that in the cited resource material, the reduced matrix (10.4) and the reduced matrix contained in (14.7) in my draft are the same although i have used different notations/symbols
foxtrotpaparomeo.wordpress.com

Show thread

updated it to include (19.9.1), which is more general in looks, while giving the initial higgs boson state full four-momentum with more than one spatial components, the final answer retains its basic form
foxtrotpaparomeo.wordpress.com

Show thread

there were errors in the discussions that have been rectified in making this update and i should emphasize that
____
The final states coming out with opposite spatial momenta, can happen only in the rest frame (center- of-mass frame) of the Higgs boson
____
foxtrotpaparomeo.wordpress.com

Show thread

i wanted to re-emphasize this in the latest updated version of my draft
------
The final states coming out with opposite spatial momenta, can happen only in the rest frame (center- of-mass frame) of the Higgs boson, where the Higgs boson doesn’t have spatial components of the four-momentum, as it decays, while the final states come out with equal energies in opposite directions, leading to (19.9.3).
------
foxtrotpaparomeo.wordpress.com

Show thread

-------
Such measurements of Yukawa couplings to light fermions are experimentally challenging at the LHC, given that the SM predicts the coupling strengths to be proportional to the fermion mass [11–13]. Consequently, couplings of the Higgs boson to the first-generation fermions have yet to be confirmed experimentally.
-------
arxiv.org/abs/2208.00265

Show thread

now, i have come to a more inclusive construction of the SU(2)XU(1) Lagrangian of the Standard Model Electro-weak theory. the other generations of the lepton family are included and as well as the three generations of the quark family.
foxtrotpaparomeo.wordpress.com

Show thread

terms that contain interactions of w^+- vector gauge bosons with members of lepton family. fermions involved expanded into + and - energy modes from such we get, for example, the term for the decay of w^+ vector bosons into an outgoing neutrino and outgoing positron, the anti-particle of electron

Show thread

W^+ boson decays into an outgoing lefthanded top quark and outgoing lefthanded anti-bottom quark, seeing such interaction in the split up of involved fermions into + & - energy modes

Show thread

updated from pages 53 to 58 it's clear in the construction that for the case of leptons, for example, righthanded leptons don't interact with the W^+- vector gauge bosons only their lefthanded counterparts and this is so since righthanded leptons have zero isospin however, seeing this would wait for the next updates in which we construct the covariant derivative terms for righthanded fermion singlets
foxtrotpaparomeo.wordpress.com

Show thread
Follow

now we have come to a basic l^(2)_(alpha)-lepton theory in the SU(2)XU(1) construction as we are still following the notations used in [5]. in the next update a basic higgs boson theory will be presented.
foxtrotpaparomeo.wordpress.com

updated (10052024) from pp.58 to 60: one thing we can highlight in those update pages is eq'n(29.1), where the vector gauge bosons W and Z acquire their masses and this involves the vacuum expectation value of the Higgs field as well as the coupling constant g_2
foxtrotpaparomeo.wordpress.com

Show thread
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.