The Dutch government is launching a new national security law that will grant *automatic* permission to do targeted surveillance of *victims* of hackers, or to hack the victims: aboutintel.eu/nl-government-wa

Dutch agencies can, under exceptional circumstances, already do targeted surveillance of "non-targets" who themselves are not of national security interest. However, because of the European human rights concept of subsidiarity, this is only allowed if other things didn't work

Show thread

Under the existing law, agencies have to ask permission to target (state sponsored) hackers. If they want to do surveillance on non-targets (for example, victims), a more stringent test applies: might these people be doctors, lawyers or otherwise sensitive groups?

Show thread

Under the new law, paradoxically, surveillance on non-targets no longer needs special permission. No permission is required at all! Not even internal permission. Adding hacking victims to a warrant becomes a purely administrative procedure.

Show thread

UPDATE: This thread was picked up by @hackernews
which generated sufficient traffic that the @aboutintel
site is now overloaded! Here is a mirror: berthub.eu/articles/posts/dutc

Show thread
Follow

@bert_hubert I hadn't heard of someone getting slashdotted in a long time...

ยท ยท 1 ยท 0 ยท 0

@werner58 hackernews can often generate tens of thousands of visitors/hour, so it is a relatively big gun.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.