The Washington Post interviewed Dril about an Elon run Twitter, and it's everything you could possibly want and more. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/11/22/dril-musk-twitter-future/
The Artemis Orion spacecraft trajectory over its 25-day mission is shown below.
Between Nov 25 and Dec 1, Orion will be in a Distant Retrograde Orbit (DRO) around the moon.
On Nov 21, Orion will be approach within 100 km of the lunar surface and fire its thrusters to steer it towards the DRO. Orion will enter DRO after another burn (DRI) on Nov 25.
OPF = Outbound Powered Flyby
DRI = DRO Insertion
DRD = DRO Departure
RPF = Return Powered Flyby
Source: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20180001259/downloads/20180001259.pdf
Go #Artemis
birdsite drama
Latest Kara Swisher piece on the antics over there. Come for the journalism, stay for the sick gifs.
Personally I hope that Space Car Guy gets hit by a hefty dose of reality, but I'm afraid she might be right.
Decided to look at network stats again. There are 1M more people using #Mastodon today than there were on October 27.
CROWLSPACE: Space Based Solar Power vs Earth-based-with-storage – Part 2
https://crowlspace.com/?p=3693
CROWLSPACE: Space Based Solar Power vs Earth-based-with-storage – Part 1
https://crowlspace.com/?p=3672
@LukaszOlejnik I realized over time that whatever you do, you cannot force people to see ideas that they don’t want to see. If people aren’t open to an idea, they will block it in RL and they will block it just as well online regardless of tech. So this really isn’t about controversial ideas, these only ever have a chance if coming from a figure of authority. It’s merely unusual ideas that people will consider if they see them.
Not really sure whether Mastodon does any worse here than Twitter does. The same bubbles that may isolate themselves on Mastodon also became massively isolated communities on Twitter, interacting with the outside world merely when attacking their “enemies” and definitely not absorbing any outside ideas. Which IMO reinforces the point that the problem here is a sociological one, not a technical.