@icedquinn @moffintosh always funny to see commies call the people managing resources "just moving around some numbers" when failing to properly do that is one of the bigger reasons why socialism always fails, and how commies managed to mismanage and fuck up an entire sea amongst other things. So close to understanding.
payment is supposed to be subject to opportunity cost
How is price connected in any way to "opportunity"?
@moffintosh @icedquinn their labour is worth around what they're paid because a market-based economy operates on the actual results of work and not some random person's judgement.
@icedquinn @moffintosh imo it comes back to wishful thinking and nor understanding the complexity of the world we live in and/or the human nature, usually due to wishful thinking.
@icedquinn @moffintosh
>the usurist inputs nothing
the usurist inputs their risk judgement and the risk they'll lose their money. Because of the fact they're personally affected by the results and this ability belongs to people who were smart enough to earn it at best and not stupid enough to lose it all at worst, this results in miles better resource management than any half-baked gov official using their two brain cells to try to decide what people should be doing. They're a necessary evil.
The combination of risk and management effort warranties big pay for anyone to be willing to do it, and most of the people whining about not having the ability to do it wouldn't want to do it anyway. They just want to slave away for stable comfortable life, in a world where the people they're envious of slave away alongside them.
@icedquinn @moffintosh there is literally no better choice though. The way they work should be fixed/improved, especially the shitty state it's in in the USA, but throwing out the entire form of managing resources has the problem that what're you gonna replace it with?
The answers are always combinations of:
- same shit but we try to do it better this time
- let's leave the management of everything in the economy to politicians, what could go wrong?
- neither, we'll sort it out without the need for authorities and it'll work out (it won't)
they regularize the wages, and access to work.
Not to any significan degree. Freelancing is viable only in some professions. Already 200 years ago artisans were getting outcompeted by factories, bankruoting them and forcing them to become workers
@Amikke @icedquinn It isn't, because what's happening there isn't just labour
@moffintosh @icedquinn again, your opinion on what is or isn't labour doesn't matter. Nor the opinion of the NEET loser who wrote the theory you're trying to use and hasn't worked legitimately in his life. Their work generates value which is returned as profit. Their rewards are proportional to value generated. That's all there is to it.
Nor the opinion of the NEET loser who wrote the theory you’re trying to use and hasn’t worked legitimately in his life.
Try again
https://blogs.dickinson.edu/digitalhistory/2017/12/14/marxs-early-journalism-career
Their work generates value which is returned as profit. Their rewards are proportional to value generated.
Value generated by who? Shifting numbers around doesn't generate value per se
@Amikke @icedquinn
If they manage resources, they should be paid no more than the labour they put into it, not a cent more. Owning stuff isn't a job