@404zzz@stereophonic.space The GTK theme does look pretty cool though.
@inference @404zzz @thebiologist1117 The performance is good but it quickly becomes clear that it is a sketchy descendant of Arch Linux with some of the best wallpapers. Performance grows worse as new sketchy applications are installed.
The wallpapers are pretty cool but the system as a whole makes me want to move back to an FSF Approved Distro. God forbid if you want to use it for development. It's a distribution that demonstrates that apt might not be perfect but it is better than pacman.
The strong suit of the distribution is the wallpapers and some of the drivers. It will break on update just like Arch. Security is sketchy and perhaps the worst I've seen. There are many issues but I don't want to ramble on.
>an FSF Approved Distro
Which one? There like only 6 now iirc.
Wait no just checked, 8 as far as the desktop ones go.
@dushman @thebiologist1117 @inference @404zzz I don't think that many are currently recommended. There's a Debian like one, an Arch like one and that's all I would trust. I used Parabola for around 3 years and it wasn't bad. The troubles of only FLOSS is less intimidating than trusting Debian as it is these days. It looks like trash and performs like it too. It only looked like trash in the past.
