@trammel @JonKramer @sbdivya "she's saying their complicit by having an awards show there" - complicit in oppression is oppression. I think the con being there is a way to bring western democratic values closer to China.
@JohnShirley2023 @trammel@mastodon.online @sbdivya ya, I doubt that. And that is probably the fundamental reason we seem to disagree.
@JohnShirley2023 @trammel@mastodon.online @sbdivya , I think Ms Divya is taking a principled stance. My only question to her was if she could accept the award without attending. I think winning and not attending would be a better choice. But, not my choice to make... And the rules for winning are unknown to me. You can possibly speak to that.
I think I took umbrage at the use of the words "virtue signalling". I think of that as a negative... Possibly because I was raised in a western nation. But the words themselves are not bad... But seem to be (mostly) used by those with bad intent. If that raising my hackles contributed to any misunderstanding, I apologize.
But I think Trammel said it best: "...she's saying their complicit by having an awards show there. That complicity serves as a tacit approval of China's oppresion which she cannot brook."
@JohnShirley2023 @JonKramer @trammel
Thanks for sharing your thoughts, John. My position is not meant to slander the Hugos or the fans, writers, and artists who choose to participate in WorldCon this year. I signed a petition last year, and I want to live by the spirit of my agreement to boycott this year's WorldCon & Hugos. I disclosed my withdrawal so I could thank those who nominated my story for the award, and to call attention to what I believe is immoral behavior by the Chinese gov't.
@JonKramer @trammel @sbdivya virtue signaling IS a negative. But I take that back."