@nobody Do you understand that you would most likely not exist at all if it didn't happen, because of how insanely cheap food production have become?
@L29Ah
* "I think", "I guess", "I believe", "In my opinion", &c, &c
@nobody Enough billions to conquer your underused land and turn it into factory farms.
Still didn't occur in South America tho, so consider settling in the Amazon feral garden to get the vibe.
> Enough billions to conquer your underused land ...
Probably not so much thanks to the billions, as thanks to the improvement in communications and transportation (read: border enforcement)
> ...turn it into factory farms
...churning out misery at 1000000x rate:)
@L29Ah besides, the "industrial revolution" != "the invention of (rail, steam engine, fertilizer, &c, &c)", but rather their adoption by the (state, market, enterprise, pick your poison). I'm not saying progress is bad, I'm saying the shit we're doing negates progress
@L29Ah There's been enough math and digging of the bones done to conclude that humans had been quite successful at sustaining themselves until the state had expanded to cover the entire planet:) Nor did the fertilizers magically eliminate hunger, rather our raising our standards in reaction to a bunch of social developments (incl. the red scare) did.
What fertilizers did do is increase the population size by a few billions. Living creatures are kind of like gases, occupy the available volume