I gotta say, although this puts me at odds with most of the community, but from what I've read, I don't really see that much of a problem with the #SCOTUS decision about the marriage websites.
In the issue at question, the business owner was rejecting a message, not a class of people. If a #gay person wanted to buy a wedding website for their straight couple friend, it would have presumably been no problem.
That's a right that owners of expressive businesses *should* have, and it should apply equally to everyone.
For example, an #LGBTQ designer should be free to reject any clients who want them to build religion-aligned anti-gay websites.
So long as we can apply the jurisprudence equally (I know, I know), this seems like the right decision for everyone.
@LouisIngenthron What you don't understand is they are following the #antiabortion #playbook nibbling away at LGBTQ rights until they are none left.
@Susan_Larson_TN ...that wasn't the playbook for abortion at all, though. They overturned Roe in one fell swoop, not by nibbling.
@Susan_Larson_TN That's a pretty shitty assumption to make about a person you've never met.