@tante What they're not taking into account is that those things are *intentional*.
When a human churns code, it's a waste of payroll. When a machine does it, it's scaffolding that holds up an undeveloped feature while the human works on developing a more important one. Of course it's going to need to be replaced later, but that doesn't mean it's slowing down development or making the codebase worse.
Like any tool, AI can be used properly or improperly. Used properly, it's a great efficiency boost.