@PattyHanson @cdarwin But he didn't have that right. It was his delusion that's at fault here, not his rights.
@LouisIngenthron @PattyHanson @cdarwin but he /did/ have a people killing device.
Just because society might be doing the right thing here doesn't mean the point is wrong.
@ketmorco Maybe I missed the point, then. What do you think it was?
@LouisIngenthron @ketmorco probably the point was that it would have been better for the public and government to work toward the prevention of killing children than to be satisfied with punishing those who do so.
@kevinbhayes @ketmorco And that's a great goal. But we also need to be realistic and realize that prevention will never be an absolute solution. And it also doesn't hurt to recognize just how much prevention society already has built-in that we take for granted.
@LouisIngenthron @ketmorco This can go far into the weeds, so I’ll conclude by saying it doesn’t have to be an absolute solution to try it. Maybe study other countries and see what they do too?
@kevinbhayes @ketmorco Yes, I'm not opposed to that. But on the flip side, we need to acknowledge that we *already are trying it*. We do tons of prevention that escapes most people's notice. No matter how much you do, there will always be tragedies that break through, and there will always be someone responding to that tragedy with "we should do more prevention." At some point, you've got to take a step back and recognize that not every tragedy is preventable and we already live in a remarkably peaceful and just society. That doesn't mean there isn't still room for improvement, but vague calls for "we should have prevented this" aren't really helpful.
