Follow
Labelling non-sexual child nudity in art as “child porn” does more to sexualize children than the art itself does. https://dallasexpress.com/tarrant/exclusive-is-the-modern-art-museum-of-fort-worth-promoting-child-porn/
@AngelNamedGvenet @ProstasiaInc @Piggy I totally agree. But to me as a pedophile, kids are always sexual, no matter if they are nude, dressed sexy or inscened in a sexual way or if its just a barefoot kid playing - I immediately get a hardon. 🍆
@Shota_Fap@eepy.express @AngelNamedGvenet@eepy.express @ProstasiaInc@qoto.org which, unfortunately, is why the feds treat it that way sometimes
However, we've seen how incompetent they usually are. Look at people like crazylittleannable and her uploading vids of her watching child rape vids with her whole face when shes a famous fansly bitch
Theyre very incompetent
@ProstasiaInc people have got to stop leaping straight to unsupported conclusions.
if everything and anything is to be seen as promoting cp. pretty soon *nothing* is to be considered "safe" and "minors" (not even children) in the west will be in the position of women under Taliban, not to ever be visible in public... and then god knows what happens in the shadows.
if everything and anything is to be seen as promoting cp. pretty soon *nothing* is to be considered "safe" and "minors" (not even children) in the west will be in the position of women under Taliban, not to ever be visible in public... and then god knows what happens in the shadows.
I actually agree with @Piggy here (Thanks for boosting this, was a good read). Please also accept it as an excuse that i misunderstood your post 🙏
Perfect example of “Modern Non-Sexual Child Nudity in Art”
The young female body is art - Nudity is nothing sexual - It’s natural
Edit: For eepy users that notice the nudity, I’m making a exception here, this does not mean nudity is allowed now.